Get the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking.
Casper Ruud vs Raphael Collignon — US Open 2R
ATP US Open
Hard Court
2nd Round
🧠 Form & Context
Casper Ruud (No. 12, age 26)
- 🇳🇴 Former US Open finalist (2022); 3-time Slam runner-up.
- 📊 2025: 29–11 (9–5 hard). Titles: Madrid Masters; Dallas finalist.
- 🔥 R1: d. Ofner 6–1, 6–2, 7–6 — no breaks conceded in sets 1–2.
- 📉 Slam 2025: AO R2 (l. Mensik), RG R2 (l. Borges), Wimbledon SF (l. Sinner) — inconsistency showing.
- 💡 Note: Confidence bump from mixed doubles runner-up (with Świątek).
- ⚠️ Watchpoint: Intensity dips in R2 matches — both Slam exits this year came there.
Raphael Collignon (No. 107, age 23)
- 🇧🇪 Challenger breakthrough, top-100 debut in 2025.
- 📊 2025: 29–17 (19–10 clay, 1–3 hard). Still adapting to tour-level hard courts.
- 🔥 R1: d. Galán 6–4, 6–4, 6–4 — composed in maiden USO MD.
- 🏟️ US Open: Main-draw debut.
- ⚠️ Weakness: Only his 2nd tour-level win in 9 tries; limited five-set mileage.
🔍 Match Breakdown
- H2H: First meeting.
- Ruud angle: Heavy topspin FH + reliable serve should push Collignon back and control longer rallies; focus level is the guardrail.
- Collignon angle: Confidence from R1, but hard-court pedigree at this level is thin; needs to shorten points and take early risks.
- Key factor: Ruud’s concentration. Replicate the Ofner level and the matchup tilts sharply his way.
🔮 Prediction
Experience and surface readiness point clearly to Ruud. Collignon may flash patches of clean hitting, but over best-of-five his lack of hard-court reps and stamina profile at tour level are tough hurdles.
Pick: Ruud in 3 sets — a tiebreak cameo is the main danger if Ruud drifts.
📊 Tale of the Tape (Qualitative)
- Experience & Slam mileage: Clear edge Ruud.
- Surface readiness: Ruud’s hard-court baseline is higher.
- Serve + forehand weight: Ruud by margin.
- Physical over five sets: Edge Ruud; Collignon’s five-set sample is minimal.
- Upset path (Collignon): Red-line early, take time away, hunt short points, and lean on breaker variance.
No comments:
Post a Comment