Thursday, October 22, 2026

Cali challenger 2026 (Colombia) 22.10.26

More second-round previews from the Cali Challenger on clay, with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Nicolas Jarry

Cali Challenger · Second Round · 21 October · 23:00

🧠 Form & Context

Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida

  • 📈 Ranked No. 240 at 25, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 69% of recent matches.
  • ✅ Beat Pereira in the first round.
  • ⚔️ Leads the head-to-head 2–1, with wins in Todi (2021) and Concepcion (2022).
  • 🔁 The better returner: 45.4% of break points converted.
  • ⚠️ Only 43% of deciding sets won over his career.

Nicolas Jarry

  • 📊 Ranked No. 854 at 31, a former top-20 player rebuilding his ranking, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Barrios Vera in the first round.
  • 🚀 A huge serve: 74.8% on first-serve points, 53.4% on second, 64.3% of break points saved.
  • ⚔️ Won their most recent meeting, 7–6 6–2 in Mexico City in 2022.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return – 37.7% of break points converted – and limited recent data.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A fourth meeting, and the first since 2022. Pucinelli de Almeida leads 2–1 and is the favourite at 1.53, with Jarry at 2.37.

Jarry's serve is the biggest weapon on court: 74.8% on first-serve points against 66.3%, and 64.3% of break points saved against 58.6%.

Pucinelli de Almeida is the stronger returner – he wins far more points against the first serve (36.7% vs 28.3%) and converts 45.4% of his break chances against 37.7%.

Jarry's recent and career numbers at this level are limited as he rebuilds his ranking, which makes his current level hard to read.

Pucinelli de Almeida has the form, the return and the head-to-head. Jarry has the serve – and if it fires, he can beat anyone at this level.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricPucinelli de AlmeidaJarry
Ranking240854
Age2531
Last 105–54–6
Head-to-head21
First serves in65.2%63.4%
1st-serve points won66.3%74.8%
2nd-serve points won51.5%53.4%
Break points saved58.6%64.3%
Break points converted45.4%37.7%
Return points won (career)42%–
Tiebreak win %48%–
Deciding-set win % (career)43%–
Best-of-3 win %61%–

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Miguel Tobon vs Nicolas Mejia

Cali Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Miguel Tobon

  • 📈 Ranked No. 466 at 20, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat the favourite Villanueva in the first round.
  • 🔓 The sharper converter: 44.5% of break points won.
  • 🎾 Wins 67% behind his first serve.
  • ⚠️ Only 43% of deciding sets won, with a 46% career record in best-of-three.

Nicolas Mejia

  • 📊 Ranked No. 115 at 26, 4–6 in his last 10, playing at home in Colombia.
  • 🎾 The steadier server: 62% of first serves in, 67.7% won behind them, 51.1% on second.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.3% of break points, 64% recently.
  • 🏆 Has won 76% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Converting only 37% of break points recently.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Mejia, playing at home, is ranked 350 places higher and is the favourite at 1.36.

Tobon arrives after upsetting the favourite Villanueva in the first round.

Mejia has the edge on serve – more first serves in, more points won behind both serves, and better break-point defence (60.3% vs 58%).

Neither returns well (40% vs 39% of return points), so breaks will be at a premium – and Mejia has won 76% of his deciding sets this season.

Mejia has the serve, the ranking and the clutch record. Tobon has the momentum.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricTobonMejia
Ranking466115
Age2026
Last 106–44–6
Head-to-head00
First serves in59.0%62.0%
1st-serve points won67.0%67.7%
2nd-serve points won49.9%51.1%
Break points saved58.0%60.3%
Break points converted44.5%41.5%
Return points won (career)39%40%
Tiebreak win %50%51%
Deciding-set win % (career)43%51%
Best-of-3 win %46%53%

See this match on Polymarket

Diego Dedura vs Felipe Meligeni Alves

Cali Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Diego Dedura

  • 📊 Ranked No. 190 at 18, left-handed, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Kicker in the first round.
  • 🎾 Lands 71.5% of first serves and wins 52.2% on second-serve points.
  • 🔁 Slightly the better returner: 43% of return points won.
  • ⚠️ Only 62.1% won behind his first serve.

Felipe Meligeni Alves

  • 📊 Ranked No. 396 at 28, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Ficovich in the first round.
  • 🚀 Serving well recently: 70% on first-serve points and 71% of break points saved.
  • 🏆 Wins 59% of tiebreaks and has won 60% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weaker on return: 40% of return points won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Dedura is the favourite at 1.61, ranked more than 200 places higher.

Meligeni Alves is the more effective server – 66.5% on first-serve points against 62.1%, and 61.2% of break points saved against 58.6% – and has been even sharper recently.

Dedura lands far more first serves (71.5% vs 67.3%) and is slightly the better returner (43% vs 40%).

Their tight-set records are almost identical over their careers, and both have won 60% of their deciding sets this season.

Dedura has the ranking; Meligeni Alves has the serve and the experience. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricDeduraMeligeni Alves
Ranking190396
Age1828
Last 104–65–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in71.5%67.3%
1st-serve points won62.1%66.5%
2nd-serve points won52.2%50.9%
Break points saved58.6%61.2%
Break points converted46.3%43.0%
Return points won (career)43%40%
Tiebreak win %58%59%
Deciding-set win % (career)50%52%
Best-of-3 win %58%60%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Carlos Maria Zarate vs Francisco Comesana

Cali Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Carlos Maria Zarate

  • 📈 Ranked No. 352 at 21, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 72% of recent matches.
  • ✅ Beat Ribero in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 42% of return points won and 44.3% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Has won 62% of deciding sets over his career and 71% this season.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 57.4% of first serves.

Francisco Comesana

  • 📊 Ranked No. 130 at 26, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Hardt in the first round – their second meeting in two weeks.
  • 🎾 Lands 66% of first serves and wins 67.6% behind them, 72% recently.
  • 📊 62% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Winning only 48% of recent matches and 35% of deciding sets this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Comesana is ranked more than 200 places higher and is a heavy favourite at 1.11.

On serve they are closer than the ranking suggests – 67.2% vs 67.6% on first-serve points – though Comesana lands far more first serves (66% vs 57.4%).

Zarate is the better returner (42% vs 41% of return points) and arrives in much better form, having won 72% of his recent matches.

Under pressure Zarate has the edge this season: 71% of deciding sets won against Comesana's 35%.

Comesana has the ranking and the first-serve percentage. Zarate's form and return make 1.11 look short.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricZarateComesana
Ranking352130
Age2126
Last 106–45–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in57.4%66.0%
1st-serve points won67.2%67.6%
2nd-serve points won48.7%49.8%
Break points saved57.2%57.4%
Break points converted44.3%43.2%
Return points won (career)42%41%
Tiebreak win %49%50%
Deciding-set win % (career)62%55%
Best-of-3 win %59%62%

See this match on Polymarket

Guangzhou challenger 2026 (China) 22.10.26

More second-round previews from the Guangzhou Challenger on hard courts, with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Keegan Smith vs Fajing Sun

Guangzhou Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 05:00

🧠 Form & Context

Keegan Smith

  • 📊 Ranked No. 196 at 28, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Purcell in the first round.
  • 🚀 Outstanding serve: 70.1% of first serves in, 71.6% won, 63.5% of break points saved.
  • ⚔️ Won their only meeting, 6–4 6–2 in Morelos in 2022.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 37% of return points won, and 34% of break points converted recently.

Fajing Sun

  • 📊 Ranked No. 296 at 30, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Qian Sun in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 41% of return points won and 43.5% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Slightly stronger on the second serve: 52.4% won.
  • ⚠️ Only 46% of tiebreaks won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A second meeting, four years after Smith won in straight sets in Morelos. Smith is the favourite at 1.44.

Smith's serve is the standout weapon: he lands 70.1% of first serves, wins 71.6% behind them and saves 63.5% of break points – all clearly ahead of Sun.

Sun is the better returner (41% vs 37% of return points) and converts more of his break chances, which is his route into the match.

In tight sets Smith has the edge: 53% of tiebreaks against 46%, and 55% of deciding sets against 50%.

Smith has the serve and the clutch numbers; Sun has the return. In a match of holds the favourite's serve should matter most, but Sun's return makes it closer than the price.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricSmithSun
Ranking196296
Age2830
Last 105–55–5
Head-to-head10
First serves in70.1%62.6%
1st-serve points won71.6%67.9%
2nd-serve points won51.8%52.4%
Break points saved63.5%58.7%
Break points converted40.1%43.5%
Return points won (career)37%41%
Tiebreak win %53%46%
Deciding-set win % (career)55%50%
Best-of-3 win %62%55%

See this match on Polymarket

Liam Broady vs Akira Santillan

Guangzhou Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 05:00

🧠 Form & Context

Liam Broady

  • 📊 Ranked No. 233 at 32, left-handed, but just 1–9 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Palan in the first round.
  • 🎾 Strong on the second serve: 52.3% won.
  • 🔒 Saves 59.8% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Winning only 37% of recent matches and converting 33% of break points lately.

Akira Santillan

  • 📊 Ranked No. 309 at 29, with a one-handed backhand, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Demin in the first round – his second win over him this month.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 71.2% won.
  • 🏆 Wins 53% of tiebreaks, with a 60% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Converts 42.2% of break points.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting between two players short of form. Broady is the favourite at 1.50 despite a 1–9 run in his last 10.

Santillan has the bigger first serve (71.2% vs 68.3% won); Broady is stronger on the second serve (52.3% vs 49.9%) and saves break points at a similar rate.

On return they are level at 40% of return points each, so this should be a serve-dominated match.

Santillan has the slightly better tiebreak record (53% vs 50%) and has been winning more of his recent matches (45% vs 37%).

Broady has the ranking and the left-handed angle; Santillan has the first serve and the better recent run. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricBroadySantillan
Ranking233309
Age3229
Last 101–94–6
Head-to-head00
First serves in62.8%61.2%
1st-serve points won68.3%71.2%
2nd-serve points won52.3%49.9%
Break points saved59.8%58.8%
Break points converted42.8%42.2%
Return points won (career)40%40%
Tiebreak win %50%53%
Deciding-set win % (career)52%50%
Best-of-3 win %59%60%

See this match on Polymarket

Cruz Hewitt vs Tristan Schoolkate

Guangzhou Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 06:30

🧠 Form & Context

Cruz Hewitt

  • 📈 Ranked No. 324 at 17, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Te in the first round.
  • 🏆 Strong in deciding sets: 61% won over his career, 56% this season.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.2% of break points.
  • 📏 A very small sample of matches at this level.

Tristan Schoolkate

  • 📊 Ranked No. 169 at 25, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Fomin in the first round.
  • 🚀 Big first serve: 74.3% won over his career, 74% recently.
  • 🔒 Saves 61.2% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Converts only 38.3% of break points, and has won 42% of deciding sets this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

An all-Australian meeting between 17-year-old Cruz Hewitt and Schoolkate. Schoolkate is the favourite at 1.33.

Schoolkate's first serve is the dominant weapon – 74.3% won against Hewitt's 68.9% – and should make his holds routine.

Neither returns well (37% vs 38% of return points), so a handful of points should decide this.

Hewitt has the better deciding-set record (61% vs 56% career, 56% vs 42% this season); Schoolkate has the slight tiebreak edge.

Schoolkate has the serve and the ranking. Hewitt has the momentum and a good record in deciders, but the favourite's serve should be the difference.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricHewittSchoolkate
Ranking324169
Age1725
Last 106–44–6
Head-to-head00
First serves in57.4%60.1%
1st-serve points won68.9%74.3%
2nd-serve points won49.8%49.1%
Break points saved60.2%61.2%
Break points converted40.3%38.3%
Return points won (career)37%38%
Tiebreak win %47%50%
Deciding-set win % (career)61%56%
Best-of-3 win %52%57%

See this match on Polymarket

Jie Cui vs Yibing Wu

Guangzhou Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 11:00

🧠 Form & Context

Jie Cui

  • 📊 Ranked No. 448 at 28, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Hsu in the first round.
  • 🔓 The sharper converter: 43.9% of break points won.
  • 🎾 Lands 63.3% of first serves.
  • ⚠️ Only 44% of tiebreaks won, and 21% of deciding sets this season.

Yibing Wu

  • 📊 Ranked No. 106 at 27, a former ATP Tour title winner, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Matsuoka in the first round.
  • 🎾 The stronger serve: 69.1% on first-serve points, 52.8% on second, 60% of break points saved.
  • 🏆 Strong in tight sets: 60% of tiebreaks and 61% of deciding sets won, with a 66% record in best-of-three.
  • ⚔️ Won their only meeting, 7–6 6–4 in Shenzhen back in 2018.

🔍 Match Breakdown

An all-Chinese second-round match. Wu is ranked more than 300 places higher and is the favourite at 1.22.

Wu has the better serve across the board – stronger behind both serves and better at saving break points (60% vs 57%).

Cui is slightly the better returner (40% vs 39% of return points) and converts more of his break chances, but neither will break often.

The tight-set gap is big: Wu has won 60% of tiebreaks and 61% of deciding sets, Cui 44% and 47% – and only 21% of deciders this season.

Wu has the serve, the ranking and the clutch record. Cui needs a lot to go his way.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricCuiWu
Ranking448106
Age2827
Last 103–75–5
Head-to-head01
First serves in63.3%61.5%
1st-serve points won67.1%69.1%
2nd-serve points won51.0%52.8%
Break points saved57.0%60.0%
Break points converted43.9%41.1%
Return points won (career)40%39%
Tiebreak win %44%60%
Deciding-set win % (career)47%61%
Best-of-3 win %56%66%

See this match on Polymarket

Florence challenger 2026 (Italy) 22.10.26

Second-round previews from the Florence Challenger on clay, including four matches moved from Wednesday, with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Oriol Roca Batalla vs Dimitris Sakellaridis

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 09:00

🧠 Form & Context

Oriol Roca Batalla

  • 📊 Ranked No. 304 at 33, with a one-handed backhand, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat the in-form Papoe in the first round.
  • 🚀 The far stronger server: 68.5% on first-serve points, 51.3% on second, 60.5% of break points saved.
  • 🏆 Has won 63% of deciding sets this season, with a 61% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Converts only 42.5% of break points.

Dimitris Sakellaridis

  • 📊 Ranked No. 555 at 20, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 43% of return points won and 46.4% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Lands 63.1% of first serves.
  • 🏆 Has won 59% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weak behind his serve: 61.6% on first-serve points, 45.5% on second, 52.9% of break points saved.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Rescheduled from Wednesday. A first meeting. Roca Batalla is a heavy favourite at 1.20 after beating Papoe in the first round.

The serve gap is large: Roca Batalla wins almost seven percentage points more behind his first serve and nearly six more on the second, and saves far more break points (60.5% vs 52.9%).

Sakellaridis is the better returner – 43% of return points against 42%, and 46.4% of break points converted against 42.5% – so he should get chances.

Their deciding-set numbers are close (52% vs 54% career), but Roca Batalla has the much stronger best-of-three record (61% vs 49%).

Roca Batalla has the serve and the experience. Sakellaridis needs his return to carry him through plenty of break points.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricRoca BatallaSakellaridis
Ranking304555
Age3320
Last 105–56–4
Head-to-head00
First serves in61.0%63.1%
1st-serve points won68.5%61.6%
2nd-serve points won51.3%45.5%
Break points saved60.5%52.9%
Break points converted42.5%46.4%
Return points won (career)42%43%
Tiebreak win %52%48%
Deciding-set win % (career)52%54%
Best-of-3 win %61%49%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Filip Misolic vs Izan Almazan Valiente

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 09:00

🧠 Form & Context

Filip Misolic

  • 📊 Ranked No. 495 at 25, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • 🎾 The stronger serve: 67.8% on first-serve points, 50.3% on second, 60.3% of break points saved.
  • 🏆 Strong in tight sets over his career: 62% of tiebreaks and 66% of deciding sets won.
  • 🔓 Converting 57% of break points recently.
  • ⚠️ Only 29% of deciding sets won this season.

Izan Almazan Valiente

  • 📈 Ranked No. 409 at 20, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 69% of recent matches.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 42% of return points won and 46.2% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Has won 67% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Saves only 54.2% of break points.
  • 📏 A small sample of matches at this level.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Rescheduled from Wednesday. A first meeting. Misolic is the favourite at 1.36, despite being ranked below the 20-year-old Almazan Valiente.

Misolic has the better serve: two percentage points more behind his first serve, three more on the second, and much stronger break-point defence (60.3% vs 54.2%).

Almazan Valiente is the better returner – 42% of return points against 40% – and arrives in far better form.

Misolic has the stronger career record in tight sets, but this season the picture flips: Almazan Valiente has won 67% of his deciding sets, Misolic only 29%.

Misolic has the serve and the career record; Almazan Valiente has the form and the return. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMisolicAlmazan Valiente
Ranking495409
Age2520
Last 105–57–3
Head-to-head00
First serves in58.4%62.9%
1st-serve points won67.8%65.9%
2nd-serve points won50.3%47.5%
Break points saved60.3%54.2%
Break points converted43.8%46.2%
Return points won (career)40%42%
Tiebreak win %62%57%
Deciding-set win % (career)66%58%
Best-of-3 win %61%58%

See this match on Polymarket

Federico Bondioli vs Francesco Forti

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 09:00

🧠 Form & Context

Federico Bondioli

  • 📊 Ranked No. 326 at 21, left-handed, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Kolar in the first round.
  • 🔓 The sharper converter: 43.7% of break points won.
  • 🎾 Lands 61.7% of first serves.
  • ⚠️ Weaker on the second serve: 48.4% won.

Francesco Forti

  • 📊 Ranked No. 329 at 27, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ⚔️ Won their only meeting, 3–6 7–6 7–5 in Lugano in February – the tiebreak went 12–10.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 70.3% won.
  • 🔒 Saves 61.1% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 59% of deciding sets over his career and 58% this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Rescheduled from Wednesday. A rematch of a three-set thriller from February, which Forti won in Lugano after a 12–10 second-set tiebreak. He is the favourite at 1.66, with the two players ranked almost level.

Forti has the clear serve edge – 70.3% on first-serve points against 67.1%, and 50.5% on second against 48.4%.

Neither returns well (40% vs 39% of return points), but Bondioli converts more of his chances (43.7% vs 41.8%).

Forti has the better tight-set record: 59% of deciding sets against 51%, and a 58% best-of-three record against 53%.

Forti has the serve and the head-to-head; Bondioli has the slightly better form and the left-handed angle. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricBondioliForti
Ranking326329
Age2127
Last 106–45–5
Head-to-head01
First serves in61.7%61.0%
1st-serve points won67.1%70.3%
2nd-serve points won48.4%50.5%
Break points saved59.8%61.1%
Break points converted43.7%41.8%
Return points won (career)40%39%
Tiebreak win %48%50%
Deciding-set win % (career)51%59%
Best-of-3 win %53%58%

See this match on Polymarket

Michele Ribecai vs Max Houkes

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 10:30

🧠 Form & Context

Michele Ribecai

  • 📊 Ranked No. 288 at 23, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 A strong returner: 45% of return points won and 46.8% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Wins 51.8% on second-serve points.
  • 📊 61% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Only 39% of deciding sets won over his career, 30% this season.

Max Houkes

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 205 at 26, left-handed, 9–1 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Serving brilliantly recently: 72% on first-serve points and 57% on second.
  • 🔓 Converts 47.5% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 55% of deciding sets, with a 66% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Weaker on the second serve over his career: 48.6% won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Rescheduled from Wednesday. A first meeting. Houkes arrives on a 9–1 run and is the favourite at 1.61.

Houkes has the stronger first serve (68.1% vs 64.1% won) and better break-point defence, and has been serving even better recently.

Both are good returners on clay – Ribecai wins 45% of return points, Houkes 44% – so breaks should come regularly.

The deciding-set gap is big: Houkes has won 55% over his career and 58% this season, Ribecai 39% and 30%.

Houkes has the form, the serve and the clutch numbers. Ribecai's return is his way into the match.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricRibecaiHoukes
Ranking288205
Age2326
Last 104–69–1
Head-to-head00
First serves in60.7%61.1%
1st-serve points won64.1%68.1%
2nd-serve points won51.8%48.6%
Break points saved56.9%60.5%
Break points converted46.8%47.5%
Return points won (career)45%44%
Tiebreak win %50%49%
Deciding-set win % (career)39%55%
Best-of-3 win %61%66%

See this match on Polymarket

Filippo Romano vs Yanaki Milev

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 10:30

🧠 Form & Context

Filippo Romano

  • 📊 Ranked No. 301 at 21, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Jianu in the first round.
  • 🚀 The bigger serve: 70% on first-serve points and 59.5% of break points saved.
  • ⚔️ Won their only meeting, 6–3 6–1 at an ITF event in Cattolica in 2025.
  • ⚠️ Weak in tight sets: 44% of tiebreaks and 39% of deciding sets won over his career.

Yanaki Milev

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 535 at 22, 8–2 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat the favourite Giustino in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 42% of return points won and 43.9% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Strong in tight sets: 58% of tiebreaks and 54% of deciding sets won.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 57.8% of first serves.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A rematch of a one-sided ITF meeting in 2025, which Romano won. Romano is the favourite at 1.53.

Romano has the bigger serve – 70% on first-serve points against 65.7% – and has been saving 66% of break points recently.

Milev is the clearly better returner (42% vs 38% of return points) and arrives in far better form, having beaten the favourite Giustino in the first round.

The tight-set numbers favour Milev: 58% of tiebreaks against 44%, and 54% of deciding sets against 39%.

Romano has the serve and the head-to-head; Milev has the form, the return and the clutch record. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricRomanoMilev
Ranking301535
Age2122
Last 103–78–2
Head-to-head10
First serves in59.7%57.8%
1st-serve points won70.0%65.7%
2nd-serve points won48.6%47.8%
Break points saved59.5%59.0%
Break points converted40.3%43.9%
Return points won (career)38%42%
Tiebreak win %44%58%
Deciding-set win % (career)39%54%
Best-of-3 win %49%55%

See this match on Polymarket

Andrej Nedic vs Alex Marti Pujolras

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 10:30

🧠 Form & Context

Andrej Nedic

  • 📊 Ranked No. 237 at 22, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 An outstanding returner: 46% of return points won and 49.7% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Much stronger on the second serve: 50.6% won.
  • 🏆 Has won 60% of deciding sets, with a 67% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Only 63.6% won behind his first serve.

Alex Marti Pujolras

  • 📊 Ranked No. 484 at 27, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Basile in the first round.
  • 🔁 Also a strong returner: 45% of return points won and 48% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Wins 55% of tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Weak on the second serve: 44.6% won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting between two strong returners. Nedic is the favourite at 1.36.

Both win plenty of return points (46% vs 45%) and convert close to half of their break chances, so expect plenty of breaks on clay.

The difference is on the second serve: Nedic wins 50.6% of those points, Marti Pujolras only 44.6% – a weakness Nedic's return should target.

Nedic also has the stronger deciding-set (60% vs 51%) and best-of-three (67% vs 61%) records; Marti Pujolras is slightly better in tiebreaks.

Nedic has the second serve and the better career numbers. Marti Pujolras's return keeps him in it.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricNedicMarti Pujolras
Ranking237484
Age2227
Last 105–56–4
Head-to-head00
First serves in64.0%63.1%
1st-serve points won63.6%64.9%
2nd-serve points won50.6%44.6%
Break points saved56.9%55.7%
Break points converted49.7%48.0%
Return points won (career)46%45%
Tiebreak win %52%55%
Deciding-set win % (career)60%51%
Best-of-3 win %67%61%

See this match on Polymarket

Henry Searle vs Matthew William Donald

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 12:00

🧠 Form & Context

Henry Searle

  • 📊 Ranked No. 220 at 20, left-handed, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Giunta in the first round.
  • 🚀 A big serve: 72.2% on first-serve points, 53% on second, 66.8% of break points saved.
  • 🏆 Has won 68% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 38% of return points won.

Matthew William Donald

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 416 at 21, 9–1 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Sanchez Jover in the first round.
  • 🔁 The far better returner: 44% of return points won and 46.5% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Lands 67.3% of first serves.
  • ⚠️ Very weak on the second serve: 43.3% won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting and a classic serve-versus-return contest. Donald is on a 9–1 run and is the favourite at 1.57, despite being ranked almost 200 places lower.

Searle's serve is a real weapon: 72.2% on first-serve points against 63.7%, a ten-point gap on the second serve, and 66.8% of break points saved.

Donald is the much better returner (44% vs 38% of return points), while Searle's weak return makes Donald's soft second serve harder to punish.

Their tight-set records are similar, though Searle has won 68% of deciding sets this season.

Donald has the form and the return; Searle has the serve and the ranking. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricSearleDonald
Ranking220416
Age2021
Last 103–79–1
Head-to-head00
First serves in62.6%67.3%
1st-serve points won72.2%63.7%
2nd-serve points won53.0%43.3%
Break points saved66.8%54.3%
Break points converted41.7%46.5%
Return points won (career)38%44%
Tiebreak win %43%50%
Deciding-set win % (career)47%50%
Best-of-3 win %60%52%

See this match on Polymarket

Samuele Pieri vs Sandro Kopp

Florence Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 12:00

🧠 Form & Context

Samuele Pieri

  • 📊 Ranked No. 312 at 24, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Damas in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 42% of return points won and 46.7% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Wins 66% of tiebreaks, with a 61% career record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Saves only 56.4% of break points.

Sandro Kopp

  • 📊 Ranked No. 308 at 26, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • 🎾 The steadier server: 67.6% of first serves in, 66.4% won behind them, 51.6% on second.
  • 🔒 Saves 59% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Converts only 41.9% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Only 41% of deciding sets won this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting between two players ranked side by side (No. 312 and No. 308). Kopp is the favourite at 1.57, despite a 3–7 run.

Kopp has the more reliable serve: more first serves in, more points won behind both serves, and better break-point defence (59% vs 56.4%).

Pieri is the better returner – 42% of return points against 40%, and 46.7% of break points converted against 41.9%.

In tight moments Pieri stands out: 66% of tiebreaks won against Kopp's 52%, and 53% of deciding sets this season against 41%.

Kopp has the serve; Pieri has the form, the return and the tiebreak record. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricPieriKopp
Ranking312308
Age2426
Last 106–43–7
Head-to-head00
First serves in63.6%67.6%
1st-serve points won64.7%66.4%
2nd-serve points won50.2%51.6%
Break points saved56.4%59.0%
Break points converted46.7%41.9%
Return points won (career)42%40%
Tiebreak win %66%52%
Deciding-set win % (career)48%50%
Best-of-3 win %61%58%

See this match on Polymarket

Lisbon challenger 2026 (Portugal) 22.10.26

The rest of the second round at the Lisbon Challenger on clay, with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Alexander Ritschard vs Raul Brancaccio

Lisbon Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 10:00

🧠 Form & Context

Alexander Ritschard

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 483 at 32, but 9–1 in his last 10 and winning 85% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 The stronger serve: 69.8% on first-serve points, 74% recently.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.5% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 80% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚔️ Won their only meeting, 6–0 6–4 indoors in 2024.

Raul Brancaccio

  • 📊 Ranked No. 230 at 29, but 3–7 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 The better returner on career numbers: 43% of return points won and 44.7% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Lands 61.8% of first serves.
  • ⚠️ Winning only 39% of recent matches and converting 34% of break points lately.
  • ⚠️ Only 45% of deciding sets won over his career.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A rematch of a one-sided indoor meeting in 2024, moved from Wednesday. Ritschard's ranking is misleading – he is on a 9–1 run – and he is a heavy favourite at 1.11, despite being ranked more than 250 places below Brancaccio.

Ritschard has the clearly stronger serve: 69.8% on first-serve points against 65.7%, and better break-point defence (60.5% vs 57.2%).

Brancaccio is the better returner on career numbers (43% vs 41%), but his form has dropped – just 39% of recent matches won.

Ritschard has also been excellent in tight finishes this season, winning 80% of his deciding sets.

Ritschard has the form, the serve and the head-to-head. Brancaccio needs a big turnaround.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricRitschardBrancaccio
Ranking483230
Age3229
Last 109–13–7
Head-to-head10
First serves in59.1%61.8%
1st-serve points won69.8%65.7%
2nd-serve points won50.0%48.3%
Break points saved60.5%57.2%
Break points converted41.4%44.7%
Return points won (career)41%43%
Tiebreak win %53%53%
Deciding-set win % (career)54%45%
Best-of-3 win %60%56%

See this match on Polymarket

Sumit Nagal vs Benjamin Hassan

Lisbon Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 13:00

🧠 Form & Context

Sumit Nagal

  • 📊 Ranked No. 281 at 29, a former top-100 player, but 2–8 in his last 10.
  • ⚔️ Leads the head-to-head 2–1, including a three-set win in Targu Mures in June.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 43% of return points won and 43.8% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Lands 67.9% of first serves and wins 56% of tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Saving only 52% of break points recently, and has won 43% of deciding sets this season.

Benjamin Hassan

  • 📊 Ranked No. 497 at 31, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Sanchez-Izquierdo in the first round.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 69.2% won, 71% recently.
  • 🔒 Saving 61% of break points recently.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 55% of first serves.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A fourth meeting. Nagal leads 2–1 and came from a set down to win their most recent, in Targu Mures in June. He is the favourite at 1.57.

Nagal is the better returner (43% vs 39% of return points) and lands far more first serves (67.9% vs 55%).

Hassan wins more points behind his first serve (69.2% vs 64.1%) and has been much stronger on break-point defence recently (61% vs 52%).

Form is the big question for the favourite: Nagal is 2–8 in his last 10 and has won only 43% of deciding sets this season, against Hassan's 53%.

Nagal has the return and the head-to-head; Hassan has the first serve and the better form. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricNagalHassan
Ranking281497
Age2931
Last 102–85–5
Head-to-head21
First serves in67.9%55.0%
1st-serve points won64.1%69.2%
2nd-serve points won50.5%50.3%
Break points saved56.6%58.3%
Break points converted43.8%41.6%
Return points won (career)43%39%
Tiebreak win %56%54%
Deciding-set win % (career)48%55%
Best-of-3 win %59%57%

See this match on Polymarket

Andrea Pellegrino vs Francesco Passaro

Lisbon Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 14:30

🧠 Form & Context

Andrea Pellegrino

  • 📊 Ranked No. 144 at 29, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • ⚔️ Leads the head-to-head 3–2, including their most recent meeting in Perugia in 2025.
  • ✅ Beat Martin Tiffon in the first round.
  • 🔓 The sharper converter: 43.1% of break points won.
  • ⚠️ Saves only 57.9% of break points.

Francesco Passaro

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 146 at 25, 10–0 in his last 10 – a run that includes last week's Maia title.
  • 🚀 The stronger serve: 68.3% on first-serve points and 52% on second, 72% and 55% recently.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.6% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 55% of deciding sets over his career, 57% this season.
  • ⚠️ Converts 41.5% of break points.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A sixth meeting between two Italians ranked side by side (No. 144 and No. 146). Pellegrino leads 3–2 and won the most recent, but Passaro arrives on a 10-match winning streak and is the favourite at 1.36.

Passaro has the stronger serve across the board, and it has been even better during his winning run.

On return they are level at 40% of return points each, though Pellegrino converts slightly more break points.

Their tiebreak records are identical (53%); Passaro has the better deciding-set and best-of-three numbers.

Passaro has the form and the serve; Pellegrino has the head-to-head. Closer than 1.36 suggests, but the streak is hard to ignore.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricPellegrinoPassaro
Ranking144146
Age2925
Last 104–610–0
Head-to-head32
First serves in62.5%65.2%
1st-serve points won65.8%68.3%
2nd-serve points won50.8%52.0%
Break points saved57.9%60.6%
Break points converted43.1%41.5%
Return points won (career)40%40%
Tiebreak win %53%53%
Deciding-set win % (career)53%55%
Best-of-3 win %53%59%

See this match on Polymarket

Andrej Martin vs Svyatoslav Gulin

Lisbon Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Andrej Martin

  • 📊 Ranked No. 358 at 37, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Tiago Torres in the first round.
  • 🏆 Has won 91% of deciding sets this season.
  • 🔁 Returns well on clay: 42% of return points won.
  • ⚠️ Weaker on the second serve: 48.9% won.

Svyatoslav Gulin

  • 📊 Ranked No. 545 at 23, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ⚔️ Won their only meeting, 7–6 6–4 in Tulln in September.
  • ✅ Beat Schoen in the first round.
  • 🎾 Stronger behind his serve: 66.3% on first-serve points, 52.4% on second.
  • 📊 69% career record in best-of-three.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A rematch from Tulln in September, which Gulin won in straight sets. Gulin is the favourite at 1.53 despite being ranked almost 200 places lower.

Gulin has the edge on serve, especially on the second ball (52.4% vs 48.9%), and saves slightly more break points.

On return there is little between them (43% vs 42% of return points), with Gulin converting more break chances.

Martin's weapon is his record in tight finishes: he has won 91% of deciding sets this season, against Gulin's 41%.

Gulin has the serve, the head-to-head and the career numbers. Martin's experience and deciding-set form make him a live underdog.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMartinGulin
Ranking358545
Age3723
Last 106–46–4
Head-to-head01
First serves in61.8%61.2%
1st-serve points won65.7%66.3%
2nd-serve points won48.9%52.4%
Break points saved57.4%58.8%
Break points converted43.7%46.0%
Return points won (career)42%43%
Tiebreak win %47%54%
Deciding-set win % (career)57%58%
Best-of-3 win %58%69%

See this match on Polymarket

Fort Worth challenger 2026 (USA) 22.10.26

The rest of the second round at the Fort Worth Challenger on hard courts, with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Jeff Wolf vs Sander Jong

Fort Worth Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Jeff Wolf

  • 📊 Ranked No. 216 at 27, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Zink in the first round.
  • 🚀 Huge first serve: 73.8% won over his career.
  • 🏆 Has won 71% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 38% of return points won.

Sander Jong

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 451 at 26, 8–2 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Maxted in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 41% of return points won and 44.7% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Has won 63% of deciding sets, with a 66% record in best-of-three.
  • ⚠️ Only 35% of tiebreaks won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Wolf is ranked well above Jong and is the favourite at 1.33.

Both serve big – 73.8% vs 72.4% on first-serve points – but Jong lands more first serves and saves more break points (62.4% vs 60.2%).

Jong is the clearly better returner (41% vs 38% of return points) and converts more of his chances.

Jong also has the better deciding-set record (63% vs 55%), but his tiebreak record is a real weakness – only 35% won, against Wolf's 49%.

Wolf has the first serve and the ranking; Jong has the form and the return. If this avoids tiebreaks, it is closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricWolfJong
Ranking216451
Age2726
Last 105–58–2
Head-to-head00
First serves in57.2%61.1%
1st-serve points won73.8%72.4%
2nd-serve points won50.8%51.2%
Break points saved60.2%62.4%
Break points converted41.5%44.7%
Return points won (career)38%41%
Tiebreak win %49%35%
Deciding-set win % (career)55%63%
Best-of-3 win %58%66%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Gabriel Debru vs Alex Rybakov

Fort Worth Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Gabriel Debru

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 673 at 20, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 86% of recent matches.
  • ✅ Beat Shick in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 41% of return points won and 43.8% of break points converted.
  • 🏆 Has won 59% of deciding sets over his career and 80% this season.
  • ⚠️ Weaker on the second serve: 48.6% won.

Alex Rybakov

  • 📊 Ranked No. 696 at 29, left-handed with a one-handed backhand, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Young in the first round.
  • 🚀 The stronger serve: 67.1% of first serves in, 69.4% won, 51.4% on second.
  • 🔒 Saves 62.2% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Only 26% of deciding sets won this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting between two players ranked side by side. Debru, on an excellent run of form, is the favourite at 1.57.

Rybakov has the better serve across the board – more first serves in, more points won behind both serves, and stronger break-point defence (62.2% vs 58.5%).

Debru is the better returner and has been winning 86% of his recent matches.

Their tiebreak records are identical (48%), but in deciding sets this season Debru has won 80% against Rybakov's 26%.

Debru has the form, the return and the clutch numbers; Rybakov has the serve.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricDebruRybakov
Ranking673696
Age2029
Last 107–35–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in63.1%67.1%
1st-serve points won67.3%69.4%
2nd-serve points won48.6%51.4%
Break points saved58.5%62.2%
Break points converted43.8%41.8%
Return points won (career)41%40%
Tiebreak win %48%48%
Deciding-set win % (career)59%44%
Best-of-3 win %59%59%

See this match on Polymarket

Erik Arutiunian vs Igor Ribeiro Marcondes

Fort Worth Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Erik Arutiunian

  • 📈 Ranked No. 588 at 22, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Andres Martin in the first round.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 70.3% won, with 67% of break points saved recently.
  • 🏆 Strong in tight sets: 62% of tiebreaks won, and 80% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 38% of return points won.

Igor Ribeiro Marcondes

  • 📊 Ranked No. 266 at 29, left-handed, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat the favourite Gorzny in the first round.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 42% of return points won and 44.5% of break points converted.
  • 🎾 Lands 65% of first serves and wins 51.3% on second-serve points.
  • 📊 63% career record in best-of-three.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting between two first-round winners. Ribeiro Marcondes is the favourite at 1.57.

Arutiunian has the bigger first serve (70.3% vs 66.6% won) and has been saving break points far better recently (67% vs 52%).

Ribeiro Marcondes is the clearly better returner – 42% of return points against 38% – which matters in a match of few breaks.

Arutiunian has the better tight-set numbers: 62% of tiebreaks against 52%, and 80% of deciding sets this season against 65%.

Ribeiro Marcondes has the ranking and the return; Arutiunian has the serve and the clutch record. Closer than the price suggests.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricArutiunianRibeiro Marcondes
Ranking588266
Age2229
Last 106–45–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in61.9%65.0%
1st-serve points won70.3%66.6%
2nd-serve points won50.1%51.3%
Break points saved59.3%57.4%
Break points converted42.5%44.5%
Return points won (career)38%42%
Tiebreak win %62%52%
Deciding-set win % (career)60%57%
Best-of-3 win %57%63%

See this match on Polymarket

Kaylan Bigun vs Aidan Mayo

Fort Worth Challenger · Second Round · 22 October · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Kaylan Bigun

  • 📊 Ranked No. 573 at 20, left-handed, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat the favourite Svajda in the first round.
  • 🚀 Winning 71% of first-serve points recently.
  • 🔁 Slightly the better returner on career numbers: 40% of return points won.
  • ⚠️ Weak in tight sets: 45% of tiebreaks and 33% of deciding sets won.

Aidan Mayo

  • 📈 Ranked No. 336 at 23, 7–3 in his last 10.
  • ✅ Beat Colton Smith in the first round – his third straight win over him.
  • 🚀 Serving brilliantly recently: 76% on first-serve points.
  • 🔒 Saves 59.9% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Only 32% of deciding sets won this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Moved from Wednesday. A first meeting between two big servers, with Mayo the favourite at 1.44.

Mayo has the stronger serve: 70.6% on first-serve points against 67.8%, 50.8% on second against 47.5%, and much better break-point defence (59.9% vs 54.1%).

Neither returns well (40% vs 39% of return points), so breaks should be rare.

Mayo also has the better tight-set record – 53% of tiebreaks against 45% – though both have struggled in deciding sets this season.

Mayo has the serve, the form and the clutch edge. Bigun's left-handed serve is his best weapon.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricBigunMayo
Ranking573336
Age2023
Last 105–57–3
Head-to-head00
First serves in56.7%57.0%
1st-serve points won67.8%70.6%
2nd-serve points won47.5%50.8%
Break points saved54.1%59.9%
Break points converted39.3%39.9%
Return points won (career)40%39%
Tiebreak win %45%53%
Deciding-set win % (career)33%47%
Best-of-3 win %42%53%

See this match on Polymarket

Wednesday, October 21, 2026

WTA Ningbo & Osaka R16, ATP Almaty, Brussels & Lyon – Daily Board 21.10.2026

PB Tennis · Wednesday 21 October 2026 · Five tournaments

Daily Board Ningbo, Osaka, Almaty, Brussels & Lyon

24 matches: Ningbo Open (WTA 500) and Japan Open Osaka (WTA 250) round of 16, plus the Almaty, Brussels and Lyon ATP 250s (round of 16 and the last first-round ties). Pinnacle prices, Polymarket prices and form snapshots for each match. 3 matches carry an Elite selection and 8 a $4.99 selection; the rest are open.

3 ELITE PICKS TODAY One in Ningbo (Cirstea–Bejlek), one in Brussels (Onclin–Struff) and one in Lyon (Bonzi–Paul), plus 8 $4.99 picks. Form read, selection and stake on Patreon.
Join PBTennis on Patreon ↗
Elite: pick for Patreon Elite members$4.99: pick for $4.99 membersCFS: Combined Form Score (0–100)Last 3: newest result firstTimes are TRT

Ningbo Open · WTA 500

R16 · 4 matches · 1 Elite · 2 × $4.99
08:00TRT · FINAL
Marie Bouzkova vs Anastasia ZakharovaPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Marie BouzkovaFAV1.22679.3%ended56.65-45-434-23W·L·L
Anastasia ZakharovaCOLLAPSE4.69020.7%ended35.73-73-738-34L·W·L
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Final: Bouzkova won 7-5, 6-2.
09:30TRT · IN PLAY
Leylah Fernandez vs Aliaksandra SasnovichPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Leylah FernandezFAV1.46966.1%live72.98-28-229-27W·L·W
Aliaksandra Sasnovich2.87033.9%live66.97-37-334-25W·W·L
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
In play at capture (10:55 TRT): 3-3 in the first set. Live prices not shown.
11:00TRT · R16
Sorana Cirstea vs Sara BejlekPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarket
Sorana CirsteaFAV1.460*66.4%64.5¢
Sara Bejlek2.880*33.6%35.5¢
ELITE PICK Form, selection and stake for Patreon Elite members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Cirstea -1.5 43.5¢ · Bejlek +1.5 56.5¢ · vol $9.9K
* No Pinnacle quote: Betfair price shown.
14:00TRT · R16
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Marta KostyukPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Ekaterina Alexandrova2.36041.2%41.5¢56.56-46-422-26W·L·L
Marta KostyukFAV1.65358.8%58.5¢64.16-46-436-11L·L·L
Polymarket sets: Kostyuk -1.5 36¢ · Alexandrova +1.5 64¢ · vol $4.4K

Japan Open Osaka · WTA 250

R16 · 4 matches
05:30TRT · FINAL
Talia Gibson vs Sinja KrausPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Talia GibsonFAV1.67158.1%ended44.84-64-642-29W·L·L
Sinja Kraus2.32041.9%ended68.97-37-357-30W·W·L
Final: Gibson won 6-2, 6-1.
05:30TRT · FINAL
Lanlana Tararudee vs Ashlyn KruegerPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Lanlana Tararudee2.27042.8%ended54.55-55-553-25W·L·W
Ashlyn KruegerFAV1.69957.2%ended52.75-55-534-22W·L·W
Final: Krueger won 6-3, 6-1.
07:00TRT · FINAL
Tereza Valentova vs Lilli TaggerPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Tereza Valentova2.05047.2%ended59.76-46-427-19W·L·W
Lilli TaggerFAV1.83052.8%ended53.15-55-535-21W·L·L
Final: Tagger won 7-5, 6-3.
08:30TRT · FINAL
Katie Boulter vs Viktorija GolubicPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Katie BoulterFAV1.92550.2%ended42.54-64-623-23W·L·L
Viktorija Golubic1.94349.8%ended51.35-55-532-26W·L·L
Final: Boulter won 6-2, 6-1.

Almaty Open · ATP 250

R16 / R32 · 6 matches · 2 × $4.99
09:30TRT · IN PLAY
James Duckworth vs Luciano DarderiPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
James Duckworth1.98048.8%live51.75-55-541-31W·L·L
Luciano DarderiFAVCOLLAPSE1.88451.2%live51.65-55-535-27L·L·W
In play at capture (10:55 TRT): Duckworth leads 7-5, 4-3. Live prices not shown.
09:30TRT · IN PLAY
Mattia Bellucci vs Tomas Martin EtcheverryPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Mattia BellucciFAV1.84752.6%live74.38-28-239-29W·W·W
Tomas Martin Etcheverry2.05047.4%live35.63-73-731-28L·L·L
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
In play at capture (10:55 TRT): Bellucci took the first set 7-6(5), trails 1-4 in the second. Live prices not shown.
11:00TRT · R16
Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Nikoloz BasilashviliPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Facundo Diaz Acosta2.96032.7%32.5¢51.36-42-554-24W·L·L
Nikoloz BasilashviliFAV1.43667.3%67.5¢79.89-19-129-30W·W·W
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Basilashvili -1.5 46¢ · Diaz Acosta +1.5 54¢ · vol $43.5K
11:00TRT · R32
Zangar Nurlanuly vs Tomas MachacPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Zangar Nurlanuly17.52*5.5%6.5¢49.14-54-35-6W·L·L
Tomas MachacFAV1.010*94.5%93.5¢42.94-64-618-17L·W·W
Polymarket sets: not shown (set line out of step with the moneyline) · vol $11.3K
* No Pinnacle quote: average bookmaker price shown.
12:30TRT · R16
Adrian Mannarino vs Andrey RublevPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Adrian Mannarino3.88024.9%24.5¢54.86-46-422-34W·L·W
Andrey RublevFAVCOLLAPSE1.28775.1%75.5¢60.46-46-435-22L·L·W
Polymarket sets: Rublev -1.5 51.5¢ · Mannarino +1.5 48.5¢ · vol $23.6K
17:30TRT · R16
Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Mikhail KukushkinPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Stefanos TsitsipasFAV1.04392.5%92.5¢68.37-37-338-22W·L·W
Mikhail Kukushkin12.907.5%7.5¢47.94-65-527-20W·L·L
Polymarket sets: Tsitsipas -1.5 78.5¢ · Kukushkin +1.5 21.5¢ · vol $3.0K

European Open Brussels · ATP 250

R16 / R32 · 6 matches · 1 Elite · 3 × $4.99
12:30TRT · R16
Martin Damm vs Francisco CerundoloPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Martin Damm2.50038.9%37.5¢44.14-64-639-30W·L·W
Francisco CerundoloFAV1.59161.1%62.5¢61.06-46-439-22L·W·L
Polymarket sets: Cerundolo -1.5 36.5¢ · Damm +1.5 63.5¢ · vol $2.3K
12:30TRT · R32
Dino Prizmic vs Damir DzumhurPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Dino PrizmicFAV1.38770.0%67.5¢56.75-56-434-20L·W·W
Damir Dzumhur3.24030.0%32.5¢56.76-46-428-32W·W·W
Polymarket sets: Prizmic -1.5 46.5¢ · Dzumhur +1.5 53.5¢ · vol $13.4K
14:00TRT · R16
Mariano Navone vs Tallon GriekspoorPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Mariano Navone2.49038.8%40.5¢44.64-64-638-27W·L·L
Tallon GriekspoorFAV1.58161.2%59.5¢41.04-64-618-23W·L·L
Polymarket sets: Griekspoor -1.5 38¢ · Navone +1.5 62¢ · vol $25.2K
15:30TRT · R16
Clement Chidekh vs Jacob FearnleyPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Clement Chidekh1.98048.9%49.5¢77.08-28-257-27W·W·W
Jacob FearnleyFAV1.89251.1%50.5¢66.77-37-337-28W·L·W
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Fearnley -1.5 30.5¢ · Chidekh +1.5 69.5¢ · vol $746
19:00TRT · R32
David Goffin vs Remy BertolaPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
David GoffinCOLLAPSE2.67036.4%36.5¢12.72-80-63-13L·L·L
Remy BertolaFAV1.52963.6%63.5¢42.94-64-635-33L·W·L
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Bertola -1.5 40¢ · Goffin +1.5 60¢ · vol $6.3K
20:30TRT · R16
Gauthier Onclin vs Jan-Lennard StruffPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarket
Gauthier OnclinCOLLAPSE3.77025.7%26.5¢
Jan-Lennard StruffFAV1.30174.3%73.5¢
ELITE + $4.99 PICK Elite and $4.99 selections on this match, with form and stake, on Patreon. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Struff -1.5 52.5¢ · Onclin +1.5 47.5¢ · vol $4.2K

Lyon Open · ATP 250

R16 / R32 · 4 matches · 1 Elite · 1 × $4.99
15:00TRT · R32
Stan Wawrinka vs Martin LandalucePatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Stan WawrinkaCOLLAPSE2.53038.4%36.5¢34.63-74-612-23L·L·W
Martin LandaluceFAV1.57861.6%63.5¢42.34-64-632-33L·W·W
Polymarket sets: Landaluce -1.5 49.5¢ · Wawrinka +1.5 50.5¢ · vol n/a
16:30TRT · R16
Corentin Moutet vs Felix BalshawPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Corentin Moutet2.04047.3%47.5¢38.73-75-514-24W·L·W
Felix BalshawFAV1.83352.7%52.5¢62.26-46-451-23W·L·W
$4.99 PICK Selection and stake for Patreon $4.99 members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Moutet -1.5 28.5¢ · Balshaw +1.5 71.5¢ · vol $10.8K
20:00TRT · R16
Moise Kouame vs Lorenzo MusettiPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarketCFSL10L10 hardL52WLast 3
Moise Kouame4.11023.5%22.5¢44.94-64-634-23W·L·W
Lorenzo MusettiFAV1.26576.5%77.5¢60.66-46-428-17W·L·L
Polymarket sets: Musetti -1.5 55¢ · Kouame +1.5 45¢ · vol $5.8K
21:30TRT · R16
Benjamin Bonzi vs Tommy PaulPatreon ↗Polymarket ↗
PlayerPinnacleNo-vigPolymarket
Benjamin Bonzi––28¢
Tommy PaulFAV––72¢
ELITE PICK Form, selection and stake for Patreon Elite members. Unlock on Patreon ↗
Polymarket sets: Paul -1.5 50¢ · Bonzi +1.5 50¢ · vol $911
No Pinnacle quote yet: see Polymarket.

Pinnacle no-vig % is the moneyline price with the margin removed. Polymarket prices are in cents (¢), roughly the implied probability, captured around 10:55 TRT 21.10. They move after that, so check the market page before acting. Volume is the whole Polymarket event; under $1K it is a weak signal.

All four Osaka matches and Bouzkova–Zakharova in Ningbo were finished at capture; Fernandez–Sasnovich, Duckworth–Darderi and Bellucci–Etcheverry were in play. Their Polymarket prices are left out. Ningbo is running late, so Cirstea–Bejlek will start after 11:00.

COLLAPSE = the player's last completed hard-court match was a straight-sets loss.

Form is the first question, not the answer. Nothing here is a pick.

```

Cali challenger 2026 (Colombia) 22.10.26

More second-round previews from the Cali Challenger on clay, with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every mat...