Thursday, November 5, 2026

PBTennis Quick Reads – Weekly Results (26 Oct – 1 Nov 2026)

Every day our PBTennis Patreon members get a short card of Quick Reads: hand-picked Challenger and Tour-level matches where the numbers point away from the bookmakers' price. Here is how every one of last week's reads performed, wins and losses alike.

Join PBTennis on Patreon

📈 The headline: +3.29u, +41.2% ROI

Quick Reads · 26 October – 1 November 2026
ReadsRecordStakedProfitROI
2412–128.00u+3.29u+41.2%

The week started badly. We went 0–6 across Monday and Tuesday and were down 1.5u at the low point. From Wednesday onwards the card went 12–6.

The average price of our reads was 2.33, so a 50% strike rate was enough for a solid profit.

🎯 By type of read

TypeRecordStakedProfitROI
Strong-conviction underdogs (0.5u)6–24.00u+3.84u+95.9%
Standard underdogs (0.25u)6–83.50u−0.04u−1.2%
Backing the favourite (0.25u)0–20.50u−0.50u−100%

Our strongest reads did the work. When most of the numbers lined up against a short-priced favourite, the underdog delivered. The standard 0.25u reads broke even, and our two favourite backs both lost.

🌍 By event

EventRecordProfit
Guayaquil5–0+4.25u
Paris Masters qualifying3–1+0.59u
Sioux Falls1–2−0.16u
Ningbo1–3−0.31u
Seoul1–3−0.56u
Brest1–3−0.51u

To be fully transparent: most of the profit came from Guayaquil. Valerio Aboian alone won three reads for +3.49u. Without Guayaquil, the week would have finished slightly down (−0.95u on 5.5u staked). The good weeks will not always be this concentrated.

📋 Every read

DateBackedEventOddsStakeResultP/L
27.10KumstatSeoul2.200.5u❌−0.50u
27.10IlaganSeoul2.100.25u❌−0.25u
27.10MilicNingbo1.400.25u❌−0.25u
27.10EcharguiBrest1.840.25u❌−0.25u
27.10AndradeSioux Falls1.530.25u❌−0.25u
27.10AboianGuayaquil2.500.5u✅+0.75u
28.10B. HarrisSeoul2.750.25u✅+0.44u
28.10RomanoBrest3.000.25u❌−0.25u
28.10GlinkaBrest2.620.25u❌−0.25u
28.10HernandezGuayaquil2.010.5u✅+0.51u
28.10MilavskySioux Falls2.370.5u❌−0.50u
29.10DanielSeoul2.200.25u❌−0.25u
29.10Bar BiryukovNingbo2.750.25u✅+0.44u
29.10AboianGuayaquil3.750.5u✅+1.38u
29.10ZarateGuayaquil2.550.5u✅+0.78u
30.10DelaneyNingbo2.620.25u❌−0.25u
30.10AboianGuayaquil2.680.5u✅+0.84u
30.10DraxlSioux Falls2.180.5u✅+0.59u
31.10KouameBrest1.980.25u✅+0.25u
31.10TiranteParis Masters Q2.100.25u✅+0.28u
31.10DuckworthParis Masters Q2.240.25u❌−0.25u
01.11Bar BiryukovNingbo (final)2.370.25u❌−0.25u
01.11BonziParis Masters Q1.940.25u✅+0.24u
01.11MolcanParis Masters Q2.310.25u✅+0.33u

🔍 What we take from it

  • Our strongest reads earned their stake. The 0.5u underdog reads went 6–2, and that is where we will keep concentrating.
  • The 0.25u reads need to be sharper. At 6–8 they only broke even, so we are reviewing how we pick them.
  • Backing favourites has not worked for us lately. Both lost this week, and we are reviewing whether they belong on the card.
  • We will keep passing when nothing stands out. We sat out several full sessions last week, and that discipline matters as much as the picks themselves.

🔒 Get the reads before the matches

On this blog you can read our full previews for every open match, with form, serve and return numbers and a Tale of the Tape. The matches on that day's card are locked here. Patreon members get the full read, the stake and the reasoning before the first ball.

Join PBTennis on Patreon

Quick Reads are short-form reads shared for information only. They are not betting advice. Please stake responsibly.

Thursday Form Radar: Paris After the Upset Storm (Day 169)

PBTennis · Tennis Form Snapshot · Day 169
Thursday Form Radar: Paris after the upset storm
Djokovic, Medvedev, Zverev and De Minaur all lost yesterday. Today the board has 7 wrong-side alerts, led by a 28-point gap with the better-form player at 2.75.
50
open matches
11
tournaments
7
wrong-side alerts
4/6
wrong-side held yesterday

Yesterday's board, checked

Every signal is checked against the next day's draw.

4 of 6 wrong-side alerts held, including a flagged underdog who won at 7.00. Others came through at 3.25, 2.63 and 2.00.
The hard part: it was a brutal day for favourites in Paris. Form-backed favourites went 5 of 11, with Zverev, Medvedev and De Minaur all beaten.
D168 signalHeld
Wrong-side alerts4 / 6
Level form at short prices4 / 6
Sub-threshold underdogs4 / 6
Form-backed favourites5 / 11
Late form-backed favourites (D165–D167)14 / 19

Paris third round: one form read open

The prices are public. Our 52-week form read on each match is on the members' board.

MatchOddsForm read
Paris · Alcaraz vs Berrettini1.12 / 6.00Form agrees with the market
Paris · Fritz vs Fils1.80 / 2.00🔒 members
Paris · Shelton vs Rinderknech1.29 / 3.75🔒 members
Paris · Paul vs Halys1.30 / 3.50🔒 members
Paris · Musetti vs van Assche1.40 / 3.00🔒 members
Paris · Ruud vs Struff1.62 / 2.30🔒 members
Paris · Etcheverry vs Hijikata1.73 / 2.10🔒 members
Paris · Borges vs Buse1.53 / 2.50🔒 members
Hong Kong · Cirstea vs Stoiana1.30 / 3.50🔒 members
Hong Kong · Eala vs Valentova1.57 / 2.38🔒 members
Hong Kong · Sonmez vs Stojsavljevic1.40 / 2.90🔒 members

In three of these 10 locked matches the underdog is slightly ahead on form, including two of the players who caused yesterday's upsets.

Today's 7 wrong-side alerts

In each of these, the market's favourite is the player in worse form.

EventMatchGap
Taranto Challenger🔒 █████ vs █████28
Taranto Challenger🔒 █████ vs █████18
Taranto Challenger🔒 █████ vs █████14
Villa Maria Challenger🔒 █████ vs █████13
Taranto Challenger🔒 █████ vs █████11
+ 2 more alerts on the members' board
Two favourites to watch in Taranto. Both won their last match as lower-rated favourites, with gaps of 26 and 32 points. Today the market backs them again, one at 1.40 against a player rated 28 points higher.

39 boards in

Signal (D130–D168)ResolvedRate
Form-backed favourites (favourite wins)65872%
Level form at short prices (favourite wins)24272%
Sub-threshold underdogs (underdog advances)28940%
Wrong-side alerts (underdog advances)38437%

Outcomes come from draw progression. These are small samples and not a betting performance record.

Unlock the full Day 169 board
All 50 matches with form tiers, all 7 wrong-side alerts named, the crisis-tier favourite, form arcs, and the full Excel and DOCX snapshot.
Open on Patreon →
Match-by-match analysis, model review and filtered selections are in the Elite membership.

#Tennis #TennisBetting #ATP #WTA #ATPChallenger #WTA125 #TennisForm #RolexParisMasters #ParisMasters #HongKongOpen #Alcaraz #Fritz #Fils #Shelton #Musetti #PBTennis

18+ only. Form ratings are an information tool, not betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

Charlottesville challenger 2026 (USA) 05.11.26

Second-round previews from the Charlottesville Challenger (indoor hard), with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every open match. Matches marked 🔒 are on today's PBTennis Patreon card. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Aidan Mayo vs Alastair Gray

Charlottesville Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Aidan Mayo

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 285 at 23, 8–2 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Strong first serve: 70.7% of points won, and 77% in recent matches.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.3% of break points, and 65% in recent matches.
  • 🎯 Wins 50.7% behind his second serve.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 57.1% of first serves, converts 39.7% of break points, and has won 36% of deciding sets this season.

Alastair Gray

  • 📈 Ranked No. 270 at 28, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 58% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 73.1% of points won.
  • 🔒 Saves 62.6% of break points and lands 62.4% of first serves.
  • 🏆 Has won 58% of deciding sets this season and 66% of best-of-three matches over his career.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return against the second serve: 50.2%.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Mayo is the 1.50 favourite. Gray comes in after beating Royer in the first round.

Gray has the slightly better serving numbers. He lands more first serves (62.4% vs 57.1%), wins more behind his first serve (73.1% vs 70.7%) and saves more break points (62.6% vs 60.3%). Behind the second serve they are level.

Neither is a strong returner. Gray is better against the first serve (34.0% vs 31.4%) and converts more break points (42.6% vs 39.7%). Against the second serve they are level.

Both come in with good form. Mayo is 8–2 in his last 10 and Gray 7–3, with almost identical recent match-win rates (57% vs 58%). Gray has the far better record in deciding sets (58% vs 36% this season).

A very close match on the numbers, with plenty of holds likely. Gray leads on most lines despite the price.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMayoGray
Ranking285270
Age2328
Last 108–27–3
Head-to-head00
First serves in57.1%62.4%
1st-serve points won70.7%73.1%
2nd-serve points won50.7%50.2%
Break points saved60.3%62.6%
Break points converted39.7%42.6%
Return points won (career)39%40%
Tiebreak win %52%53%
Deciding-set win % (career)47%54%
Best-of-3 win %53%66%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Daniel Milavsky vs Max Hans Rehberg

Charlottesville Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 17:30

🧠 Form & Context

Daniel Milavsky

  • 📊 Ranked No. 307 at 25, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 72.4% of points won.
  • 🔒 Saves 64.1% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 64% of best-of-three matches over his career.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 60.5% of first serves, and has won 42% of his career tiebreaks.

Max Hans Rehberg

  • 📈 Ranked No. 248 at 23, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 64% of recent matches.
  • 🎯 Lands 67.4% of first serves and wins 51.9% behind his second.
  • 🎯 Converts 44.2% of break points, and 48% in recent matches.
  • 🔒 Has saved 64% of break points in recent matches.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return against the first serve: 31.1%.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Milavsky is the 1.72 favourite, with Rehberg at 2.00.

Milavsky has the bigger first serve (72.4% vs 68.2%) and saves more break points (64.1% vs 61.0%). Rehberg lands far more first serves (67.4% vs 60.5%). Behind the second serve they are level.

Neither is a strong returner. They are almost level against both serves, and Rehberg converts more break points (44.2% vs 41.0%).

The form is with Rehberg: 7–3 in his last 10 against 5–5, and 64% vs 58% of recent matches won. He also has the better tiebreak record (53% vs 42%).

Expect plenty of holds. Milavsky's serve explains the price, but Rehberg's form and tiebreak record make this very close.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMilavskyRehberg
Ranking307248
Age2523
Last 105–57–3
Head-to-head00
First serves in60.5%67.4%
1st-serve points won72.4%68.2%
2nd-serve points won52.0%51.9%
Break points saved64.1%61.0%
Break points converted41.0%44.2%
Return points won (career)40%39%
Tiebreak win %42%53%
Deciding-set win % (career)50%49%
Best-of-3 win %64%57%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Maks Kasnikowski vs Michael Antonius

Charlottesville Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 19:00

🧠 Form & Context

Maks Kasnikowski

  • 📈 Ranked No. 211 at 23, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 60% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 71.0% of points won, and 72% in recent matches.
  • 🎯 Wins 51.7% behind his second serve.
  • 🏆 Has won 62% of best-of-three matches over his career, and beat Draxl in the first round.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 58.8% of first serves, and has won 39% of deciding sets this season.

Michael Antonius

  • 📈 Ranked No. 619 at 16, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 67% of recent matches.
  • 🎯 Lands 65.2% of first serves and wins 52.4% behind his second.
  • 🔁 Strong against the second serve: 55.4%.
  • 🏆 Has won 67% of deciding sets and 67% of tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Very little data on him at this level.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Kasnikowski is the 1.36 favourite against the 16-year-old Antonius.

Kasnikowski has the bigger first serve (71.0% vs 66.9%). Antonius lands far more first serves (65.2% vs 58.8%), is slightly stronger behind the second (52.4% vs 51.7%) and saves more break points (61.4% vs 58.8%).

On return they are level against the first serve (33.7%). Antonius is far better against the second (55.4% vs 52.2%) and converts slightly more break points (43.8% vs 43.0%).

Both are 5–5 in their last 10, but Antonius has won more of his recent matches (67% vs 60%) and has the better records in deciding sets and tiebreaks.

Kasnikowski's experience explains the price. Antonius's numbers make this close, though from very little data.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricKasnikowskiAntonius
Ranking211619
Age2316
Last 105–55–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in58.8%65.2%
1st-serve points won71.0%66.9%
2nd-serve points won51.7%52.4%
Break points saved58.8%61.4%
Break points converted43.0%43.8%
Return points won (career)41%42%
Tiebreak win %52%67%
Deciding-set win % (career)49%67%
Best-of-3 win %62%66%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Andres Andrade vs James Kent Trotter

Charlottesville Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 23:00

🔒 Members-only read

This match is on today's PBTennis Patreon card. The full breakdown – form, serve and return numbers, the Tale of the Tape and our read on the match – is available to our members.

Read it on Patreon

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Costa do Sauipe challenger 2026 (Brazil) 05.11.26

Second-round previews from the Costa do Sauipe Challenger (clay), with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Filip Misolic

Costa do Sauipe Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 18:00

🧠 Form & Context

Facundo Diaz Acosta

  • 📈 Ranked No. 72 at 25, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 73% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 Slightly stronger behind both serves: 68.6% on the first and 51.2% on the second.
  • 🔁 Slightly the better returner: 35.6% against the first serve and 52.8% against the second.
  • 🏆 Has won 70% of deciding sets this season and 63% of best-of-three matches over his career.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 59.8% of first serves.

Filip Misolic

  • 📈 Ranked No. 676 at 25, 7–3 in his last 10.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.3% of break points.
  • 🚀 Wins 67.8% behind his first serve.
  • 🏆 Has won 62% of his career tiebreaks and 66% of deciding sets over his career.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 25% of deciding sets this season and 53% of his recent matches.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting between two 25-year-olds. Diaz Acosta, a left-hander, is the 1.50 favourite. Misolic comes in after beating Varillas in the first round.

On serve the two are very close. Diaz Acosta wins slightly more behind both serves (68.6% vs 67.8% and 51.2% vs 50.4%) and lands slightly more first serves. Misolic saves slightly more break points (60.3% vs 59.5%).

Diaz Acosta is slightly the better returner, with 35.6% vs 33.5% against the first serve and 52.8% vs 51.6% against the second. They convert break points at the same rate.

Misolic has the better last 10 (7–3 vs 6–4), but Diaz Acosta has won far more of his recent matches (73% vs 53%) and far more deciding sets this season (70% vs 25%). Over his career, Misolic has the better records in tiebreaks and deciding sets.

Diaz Acosta has small edges on most lines, which supports the price.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricDiaz AcostaMisolic
Ranking72676
Age2525
Last 106–47–3
Head-to-head00
First serves in59.8%58.3%
1st-serve points won68.6%67.8%
2nd-serve points won51.2%50.4%
Break points saved59.5%60.3%
Break points converted43.6%43.4%
Return points won (career)42%40%
Tiebreak win %50%62%
Deciding-set win % (career)55%66%
Best-of-3 win %63%61%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Thiago Moura Monteiro vs Marco Cecchinato

Costa do Sauipe Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 19:30

🧠 Form & Context

Thiago Moura Monteiro

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 233 at 32, 8–2 in his last 10 and winning 64% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 Strong behind both serves: 71.2% on the first and 52.2% on the second.
  • 🔒 Saves 62.4% of break points.
  • 🏆 Leads the head-to-head 3–1, and has won 68% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 29.1% against the first serve and 40.5% of break points converted.

Marco Cecchinato

  • 📊 Ranked No. 183 at 34, 4–6 in his last 10 but winning 58% of recent matches.
  • 🎯 Lands 65.1% of first serves and saves 59.8% of break points.
  • 🔁 Slightly the better returner: 31.9% against the first serve and 50.2% against the second.
  • 🏆 Has won 54% of his career tiebreaks, and beat Comesana in the first round.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 42% of deciding sets this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their fifth meeting, all on clay. Moura Monteiro, a left-hander, leads 3–1 and won the most recent in two tiebreaks in Lisbon in September 2025. He is the 1.72 favourite.

Moura Monteiro is the stronger server. He wins 71.2% behind his first serve to 68.3%, 52.2% behind his second to 51.5%, and saves more break points (62.4% vs 59.8%). Cecchinato lands slightly more first serves.

Neither is a strong returner. Cecchinato is slightly better against both serves (31.9% vs 29.1% and 50.2% vs 49.5%) and converts slightly more break points (41.3% vs 40.5%).

The form is firmly with Moura Monteiro: 8–2 in his last 10 against 4–6, and 64% vs 58% of recent matches won. He has also won far more deciding sets this season (68% vs 42%).

Moura Monteiro's serve, form and head-to-head support the price. Their meetings tend to be close, so expect tiebreaks.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMoura MonteiroCecchinato
Ranking233183
Age3234
Last 108–24–6
Head-to-head31
First serves in64.4%65.1%
1st-serve points won71.2%68.3%
2nd-serve points won52.2%51.5%
Break points saved62.4%59.8%
Break points converted40.5%41.3%
Return points won (career)–39%
Tiebreak win %52%54%
Deciding-set win % (career)57%52%
Best-of-3 win %57%57%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Elmer Moller

Costa do Sauipe Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 19:30

🧠 Form & Context

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 177 at 26, 8–2 in his last 10 and winning 58% of recent matches.
  • 🎯 Lands 63.7% of first serves and wins 49.3% behind his second.
  • 🚀 Has won 68% behind his first serve in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Has won 56% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ The weaker returner: 34.9% against the first serve and 51.9% against the second.

Elmer Moller

  • 📈 Ranked No. 150 at 23, 7–3 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 The far better returner: 37.0% against the first serve and 56.9% against the second.
  • 🎯 Converts 46.5% of break points and saves 58.5%.
  • 🏆 Won their only meeting, and has won 64% of best-of-three matches over his career.
  • ⚠️ Weak behind his second serve: 47.1% of points won.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their second meeting. Moller won the first 7–5, 6–2 on clay in Zagreb in May. He is the 1.61 favourite.

On serve they are close. They are level behind the first serve (65.8% vs 65.7%), Reis Da Silva is stronger behind the second (49.3% vs 47.1%) and lands slightly more first serves. Moller saves slightly more break points.

Moller is far stronger on return. He wins 37.0% of points against the first serve to 34.9%, and 56.9% against the second to 51.9%. He also converts more break points (46.5% vs 44.1%).

Both come in with good form. Reis Da Silva is 8–2 in his last 10 and Moller 7–3, with similar recent match-win rates (58% vs 56%).

Moller's return game and the head-to-head explain the price. Reis Da Silva's form makes this close.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricReis Da SilvaMoller
Ranking177150
Age2623
Last 108–27–3
Head-to-head01
First serves in63.7%62.7%
1st-serve points won65.8%65.7%
2nd-serve points won49.3%47.1%
Break points saved58.0%58.5%
Break points converted44.1%46.5%
Return points won (career)41%45%
Tiebreak win %56%55%
Deciding-set win % (career)46%50%
Best-of-3 win %55%64%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Franco Roncadelli

Costa do Sauipe Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 22:00

🧠 Form & Context

Thiago Seyboth Wild

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 109 at 26, 9–1 in his last 10 and winning 76% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 The far stronger server: 70.2% behind his first serve and 51.3% behind his second.
  • 🔒 Saves 61.1% of break points, and 66% in recent matches.
  • 🎯 Has won 56% behind his second serve in recent matches.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 32.4% against the first serve and 41.3% of break points converted.

Franco Roncadelli

  • 📉 Ranked No. 261 at 26, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 The far better returner: 39.7% against the first serve and 55.3% against the second.
  • 🎯 Converts 48.7% of break points, and 52% in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Has won 70% of deciding sets this season and 58% over his career.
  • ⚠️ Weak on serve: 59.1% behind his first serve and 54.2% of break points saved.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Seyboth Wild is the 1.08 favourite. Roncadelli is a left-hander.

Seyboth Wild is far stronger on serve. He wins 70.2% behind his first serve to 59.1%, 51.3% behind his second to 47.4%, and saves far more break points (61.1% vs 54.2%). Roncadelli lands far more first serves (74.2% vs 61.5%).

Roncadelli is far stronger on return. He wins 39.7% of points against the first serve to 32.4%, and 55.3% against the second to 50.0%. He also converts far more break points (48.7% vs 41.3%).

The form is firmly with Seyboth Wild: 9–1 in his last 10 against 3–7, and 76% vs 55% of recent matches won. Roncadelli has the better record in deciding sets.

Seyboth Wild's serve and form support the very short price.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricSeyboth WildRoncadelli
Ranking109261
Age2626
Last 109–13–7
Head-to-head00
First serves in61.5%74.2%
1st-serve points won70.2%59.1%
2nd-serve points won51.3%47.4%
Break points saved61.1%54.2%
Break points converted41.3%48.7%
Return points won (career)39%46%
Tiebreak win %49%49%
Deciding-set win % (career)45%58%
Best-of-3 win %57%57%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Villa Maria challenger 2026 (Argentina) 05.11.26

Second-round previews from the Villa Maria Challenger (clay), with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every open match. Matches marked 🔒 are on today's PBTennis Patreon card. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Juan Bautista Torres vs Ryan Nijboer

Villa Maria Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 15:00

🔒 Members-only read

This match is on today's PBTennis Patreon card. The full breakdown – form, serve and return numbers, the Tale of the Tape and our read on the match – is available to our members.

Read it on Patreon

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Ignacio Monzon vs Genaro Alberto Olivieri

Villa Maria Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 16:30

🧠 Form & Context

Ignacio Monzon

  • 📈 Ranked No. 578 at 28, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 60% of recent matches.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 38.7% against the first serve and 54.7% against the second.
  • 🎯 Converts 48.4% of break points and lands 70.7% of first serves.
  • 🏆 Has won 58% of deciding sets this season, and beat Agamenone in the first round.
  • ⚠️ Weak on serve: 59.2% behind his first serve, 45.0% behind his second, and 52.9% of break points saved.

Genaro Alberto Olivieri

  • 📉 Ranked No. 257 at 28, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 The stronger server: 62.8% behind his first serve and 49.3% behind his second.
  • 🔒 Saves 55.4% of break points.
  • 🏆 Leads the head-to-head 2–0, and has won 57% of deciding sets over his career.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 47% of his recent matches, and converts 43.4% of break points.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their third meeting, both previous ones on clay. Olivieri won both, most recently 6–4, 6–0 at the Santo Domingo Challenger in 2023. He is the 1.14 favourite.

Olivieri is the stronger server. He wins 62.8% behind his first serve to 59.2%, 49.3% behind his second to 45.0%, and saves more break points (55.4% vs 52.9%). Monzon lands more first serves (70.7% vs 66.6%).

Monzon is the better returner, with 38.7% vs 36.6% against the first serve and 54.7% vs 52.5% against the second, and converts far more break points (48.4% vs 43.4%).

The form is with Monzon: 6–4 in his last 10 against 4–6, and 60% vs 47% of recent matches won. He has also won more deciding sets this season (58% vs 52%).

Olivieri's serve and the head-to-head explain the price. Monzon's form and return game suggest a closer match than 1.14.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMonzonOlivieri
Ranking578257
Age2828
Last 106–44–6
Head-to-head02
First serves in70.7%66.6%
1st-serve points won59.2%62.8%
2nd-serve points won45.0%49.3%
Break points saved52.9%55.4%
Break points converted48.4%43.4%
Return points won (career)44%42%
Tiebreak win %47%52%
Deciding-set win % (career)49%57%
Best-of-3 win %54%56%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Murkel Dellien

Villa Maria Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 16:30

🔒 Members-only read

This match is on today's PBTennis Patreon card. The full breakdown – form, serve and return numbers, the Tale of the Tape and our read on the match – is available to our members.

Read it on Patreon

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Federico Coria vs Valerio Aboian

Villa Maria Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 20:00

🔒 Members-only read

This match is on today's PBTennis Patreon card. The full breakdown – form, serve and return numbers, the Tale of the Tape and our read on the match – is available to our members.

Read it on Patreon

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Bratislava 2 challenger 2026 (Slovakia) 05.11.26

Second-round previews from the Bratislava 2 Challenger (indoor hard), with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Tom Gentzsch vs Matej Dodig

Bratislava 2 Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 12:30

🧠 Form & Context

Tom Gentzsch

  • 📈 Ranked No. 165 at 23, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 61% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 Strong first serve: 71.0% of points won, and 74% in recent matches.
  • 🔒 Saves 61.6% of break points and lands 63.4% of first serves.
  • 🏆 Has won 63% of deciding sets this season and 59% of his career tiebreaks. Beat Damm in the first round.
  • ⚠️ Weak behind his second serve: 47.6% of points won.

Matej Dodig

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 138 at 21, 8–2 in his last 10 and winning 70% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 Strong behind both serves: 70.7% on the first and 50.4% on the second.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.8% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 66% of deciding sets this season and 63% of best-of-three matches over his career.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 59.8% of first serves and converts 40.8% of break points.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Dodig is the 1.53 favourite. Gentzsch comes in after beating the favourite Damm in the first round.

On serve they are very close. Gentzsch lands more first serves (63.4% vs 59.8%), and they are level behind the first serve (71.0% vs 70.7%). Dodig is stronger behind the second (50.4% vs 47.6%), and Gentzsch saves slightly more break points (61.6% vs 60.8%).

Neither is a strong returner. They are level against the first serve, Dodig is better against the second (51.9% vs 50.9%), and Gentzsch converts slightly more break points (42.0% vs 40.8%).

The form is with Dodig: 8–2 in his last 10 against 5–5, and 70% vs 61% of recent matches won. Gentzsch has the better tiebreak record (59% vs 56%).

A close contest on the numbers. Dodig's form explains the price, and with two strong servers, tiebreaks are likely.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricGentzschDodig
Ranking165138
Age2321
Last 105–58–2
Head-to-head00
First serves in63.4%59.8%
1st-serve points won71.0%70.7%
2nd-serve points won47.6%50.4%
Break points saved61.6%60.8%
Break points converted42.0%40.8%
Return points won (career)39%40%
Tiebreak win %59%56%
Deciding-set win % (career)50%60%
Best-of-3 win %59%63%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Laslo Djere vs Otto Virtanen

Bratislava 2 Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 12:30

🧠 Form & Context

Laslo Djere

  • 📈 Ranked No. 137 at 31, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 67% of recent matches.
  • 🎯 Lands 60.5% of first serves and wins 50.0% behind his second.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.1% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 57% of deciding sets this season and over his career.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return: 30.5% against the first serve.

Otto Virtanen

  • 📊 Ranked No. 116 at 25, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 A big first serve: 73.6% of points won, and 77% in recent matches.
  • 🔒 Saves 62.3% of break points, and 69% in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Has won 54% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Converts only 38.8% of break points (35% in recent matches), and has won 38% of deciding sets this season.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Virtanen is the 1.53 favourite.

Virtanen has the bigger first serve (73.6% vs 69.9%) and saves more break points (62.3% vs 60.1%). Djere lands slightly more first serves, and they are level behind the second.

Neither is a strong returner. They are level against the first serve (30.5% vs 30.8%), Djere is better against the second (51.4% vs 49.3%), and he converts more break points (41.2% vs 38.8%).

The form is with Djere: 7–3 in his last 10 against 5–5, and 67% vs 57% of recent matches won. He has also won far more deciding sets this season (57% vs 38%).

Expect plenty of holds. Virtanen's first serve explains the price, but Djere's form and record in tight finishes make this close.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricDjereVirtanen
Ranking137116
Age3125
Last 107–35–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in60.5%59.2%
1st-serve points won69.9%73.6%
2nd-serve points won50.0%49.9%
Break points saved60.1%62.3%
Break points converted41.2%38.8%
Return points won (career)39%38%
Tiebreak win %49%54%
Deciding-set win % (career)57%51%
Best-of-3 win %60%59%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Jurij Rodionov vs Toby Samuel

Bratislava 2 Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 14:00

🧠 Form & Context

Jurij Rodionov

  • 📈 Ranked No. 142 at 27, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 60% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 Strong first serve: 70.7% of points won, and 73% in recent matches.
  • 🔒 Saves 62.3% of break points, and 66% in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Has won 55% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Very weak on return: 29.8% against the first serve, and only 41.1% of break points converted.

Toby Samuel

  • 📈 Ranked No. 97 at 24, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 62% of recent matches.
  • 🔁 The far better returner: 35.7% against the first serve and 53.3% against the second.
  • 🎯 Converts 46.8% of break points and saves 64.7%.
  • 🎯 Lands 65.4% of first serves and wins 52.2% behind his second.
  • 🏆 Has won 74% of best-of-three matches over his career.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Samuel is the 1.61 favourite. Rodionov is a left-hander.

Samuel lands far more first serves (65.4% vs 60.6%), is stronger behind his second (52.2% vs 49.8%) and saves more break points (64.7% vs 62.3%). Behind the first serve they are level.

Samuel is far stronger on return. He wins 35.7% of points against the first serve to 29.8%, and 53.3% against the second to 50.4%. He also converts far more break points (46.8% vs 41.1%).

Rodionov has the slightly better last 10 (6–4 vs 5–5), and their recent match-win rates are almost identical (60% vs 62%).

Samuel leads on most serve and return lines, which supports the price.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricRodionovSamuel
Ranking14297
Age2724
Last 106–45–5
Head-to-head00
First serves in60.6%65.4%
1st-serve points won70.7%70.2%
2nd-serve points won49.8%52.2%
Break points saved62.3%64.7%
Break points converted41.1%46.8%
Return points won (career)38%42%
Tiebreak win %55%59%
Deciding-set win % (career)52%51%
Best-of-3 win %57%74%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Dalibor Svrcina vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard

Bratislava 2 Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 16:00

🧠 Form & Context

Dalibor Svrcina

  • 📈 Ranked No. 119 at 24, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 59% of recent matches.
  • 🔁 An outstanding returner: 38.6% against the first serve and 55.8% against the second.
  • 🎯 Converts 48.4% of his break points.
  • 🎯 Lands 66.1% of first serves.
  • ⚠️ Weak on serve: 62.5% behind his first serve, 44.6% behind his second, and 54.2% of break points saved.

Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard

  • 📉 Ranked No. 145 at 23, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 A huge serve: 77.7% behind his first serve and 52.2% behind his second.
  • 🔒 Saves 66.2% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 60% of deciding sets and 58% of tiebreaks over his career.
  • ⚠️ Very weak on return: 25.0% against the first serve and 41.7% against the second. Has won only 39% of his recent matches.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Mpetshi Perricard is the 1.66 favourite.

Mpetshi Perricard is far stronger on serve. He wins 77.7% behind his first serve to 62.5%, 52.2% behind his second to 44.6%, and saves far more break points (66.2% vs 54.2%).

Svrcina is far stronger on return. He wins 38.6% of points against the first serve to 25.0%, and 55.8% against the second to 41.7%. He also converts far more break points (48.4% vs 34.3%).

The form is with Svrcina: 6–4 in his last 10 against 4–6, and 59% vs 39% of recent matches won.

An extreme serve-versus-return contest. Expect tiebreaks, where Mpetshi Perricard has the better record.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricSvrcinaMpetshi Perricard
Ranking119145
Age2423
Last 106–44–6
Head-to-head00
First serves in66.1%63.8%
1st-serve points won62.5%77.7%
2nd-serve points won44.6%52.2%
Break points saved54.2%66.2%
Break points converted48.4%34.3%
Return points won (career)45%31%
Tiebreak win %51%58%
Deciding-set win % (career)54%60%
Best-of-3 win %57%56%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Kimmer Coppejans

Bratislava 2 Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 17:30

🧠 Form & Context

Nicolai Budkov Kjaer

  • 📈 Ranked No. 182 at 20, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Stronger behind both serves: 68.2% on the first and 51.0% on the second.
  • 🔒 Saves 58.6% of break points.
  • 🏆 Won their only meeting, and has won 70% of deciding sets this season and 64% over his career.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 49% of his recent matches, and converted 40% of break points in recent matches.

Kimmer Coppejans

  • 📉 Ranked No. 225 at 32, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 35.3% against the first serve and 52.6% against the second.
  • 🎯 Lands 64.2% of first serves.
  • 🏆 Has won 57% of deciding sets over his career.
  • ⚠️ Weak behind his second serve (48.4%, and 46% in recent matches).

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their second meeting. Budkov Kjaer came from a set down to win the first at an ITF event in Sardinia in 2024. He is the 1.33 favourite.

Budkov Kjaer is the stronger server. He wins 68.2% behind his first serve to 67.1%, 51.0% behind his second to 48.4%, and saves slightly more break points (58.6% vs 58.0%). Coppejans lands slightly more first serves.

Coppejans is the better returner, with 35.3% vs 32.5% against the first serve and 52.6% vs 52.2% against the second. Budkov Kjaer converts slightly more break points (44.1% vs 43.3%).

Budkov Kjaer has the better last 10 (6–4 vs 3–7), but Coppejans has won more of his recent matches (55% vs 49%). Budkov Kjaer has the far better record in deciding sets (70% vs 55% this season).

Budkov Kjaer's serve and record in tight finishes support the price. Coppejans's return game and experience could make it closer.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricBudkov KjaerCoppejans
Ranking182225
Age2032
Last 106–43–7
Head-to-head10
First serves in63.2%64.2%
1st-serve points won68.2%67.1%
2nd-serve points won51.0%48.4%
Break points saved58.6%58.0%
Break points converted44.1%43.3%
Return points won (career)40%42%
Tiebreak win %56%54%
Deciding-set win % (career)64%57%
Best-of-3 win %61%58%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Taranto challenger 2026 (Italy) 05.11.26

Second-round previews from the Taranto Challenger (hard), with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every open match. Matches marked 🔒 are on today's PBTennis Patreon card. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.

Felix Gill vs Buvaysar Gadamauri

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 09:30

🧠 Form & Context

Felix Gill

  • 📊 Ranked No. 228 at 24, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Strong behind both serves: 67.1% on the first and 52.0% on the second.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.7% of break points and converts 44.5%.
  • 🏆 Leads the head-to-head 3–0, and has won 70% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 44% of his recent matches, and converted 36% of break points in recent matches.

Buvaysar Gadamauri

  • 📉 Ranked No. 266 at 26, 3–7 in his last 10 but winning 59% of recent matches.
  • 🎯 Lands 63.9% of first serves and wins 66.3% behind his first serve.
  • 🔁 Level with Gill against the first serve: 34.9%.
  • 🏆 Has won 57% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 45% of deciding sets this season, and has lost all three meetings with Gill.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their fourth meeting. Gill, a left-hander, leads 3–0 and won the most recent in a final set at the San Gregorio di Catania Challenger in October. He is the 1.66 favourite.

On serve there is very little between them. Gill wins slightly more behind both serves (67.1% vs 66.3% and 52.0% vs 51.2%) and saves slightly more break points (60.7% vs 59.7%). Gadamauri lands slightly more first serves.

On return they are level against the first serve (34.6% vs 34.9%), while Gill is better against the second (52.9% vs 50.9%) and converts more break points (44.5% vs 42.8%).

Gill has the better last 10 (6–4 vs 3–7), but Gadamauri has won more of his recent matches (59% vs 44%). Gill has won far more deciding sets this season (70% vs 45%).

Gill's slight edges across the board and the head-to-head explain the price. Expect plenty of holds.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricGillGadamauri
Ranking228266
Age2426
Last 106–43–7
Head-to-head30
First serves in63.0%63.9%
1st-serve points won67.1%66.3%
2nd-serve points won52.0%51.2%
Break points saved60.7%59.7%
Break points converted44.5%42.8%
Return points won (career)42%41%
Tiebreak win %58%57%
Deciding-set win % (career)55%50%
Best-of-3 win %64%60%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Adrian Andreev vs Matteo Martineau

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 09:30

🔒 Members-only read

This match is on today's PBTennis Patreon card. The full breakdown – form, serve and return numbers, the Tale of the Tape and our read on the match – is available to our members.

Read it on Patreon

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Jay Clarke vs Gianluca Cadenasso

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 09:30

🧠 Form & Context

Jay Clarke

  • 📊 Ranked No. 241 at 28, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Stronger behind both serves: 68.2% on the first and 50.9% on the second.
  • 🔒 Saves 58.3% of break points, and 62% in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Won their only meeting.
  • ⚠️ Lands only 58.2% of first serves, and has won 38% of deciding sets this season.

Gianluca Cadenasso

  • 📈 Ranked No. 215 at 22, 7–3 in his last 10.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 38.1% against the first serve and 54.6% against the second.
  • 🎯 Converts 47.0% of his break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 68% of deciding sets this season, 69% over his career, and 61% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Saves only 54.3% of break points.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their second meeting. Clarke won the first from a set down at an ITF event in Hammamet in 2024. He is the 1.80 favourite, with Cadenasso at 1.90.

Clarke is the stronger server. He wins 68.2% behind his first serve to 64.8%, 50.9% behind his second to 49.4%, and saves far more break points (58.3% vs 54.3%). Cadenasso lands more first serves (61.4% vs 58.2%).

Cadenasso is the better returner, with 38.1% vs 34.5% against the first serve and 54.6% vs 52.1% against the second, and converts more break points (47.0% vs 44.5%).

The form is with Cadenasso: 7–3 in his last 10 against 5–5, and 55% vs 51% of recent matches won. He also has the far better record in deciding sets (68% vs 38% this season).

Close on price and close on the numbers. Clarke has the serve, and Cadenasso the return game and the form.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricClarkeCadenasso
Ranking241215
Age2822
Last 105–57–3
Head-to-head10
First serves in58.2%61.4%
1st-serve points won68.2%64.8%
2nd-serve points won50.9%49.4%
Break points saved58.3%54.3%
Break points converted44.5%47.0%
Return points won (career)41%44%
Tiebreak win %50%61%
Deciding-set win % (career)53%69%
Best-of-3 win %59%65%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Maxim Mrva vs Thomas Faurel

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 11:00

🔒 Members-only read

This match is on today's PBTennis Patreon card. The full breakdown – form, serve and return numbers, the Tale of the Tape and our read on the match – is available to our members.

Read it on Patreon

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Sumit Nagal vs Hugo Grenier

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 11:00

🧠 Form & Context

Sumit Nagal

  • 📉 Ranked No. 265 at 29, 3–7 in his last 10.
  • 🎯 Lands 68.0% of first serves and wins 50.5% behind his second.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 35.4% against the first serve and 54.3% against the second.
  • 🏆 Has won 56% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 43% of deciding sets this season, and saves 56.7% of break points.

Hugo Grenier

  • 📊 Ranked No. 394 at 30, 5–5 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 The bigger first serve: 71.1% of points won, and 70% in recent matches.
  • 🔒 Saves 60.5% of break points.
  • 🏆 Has won 64% of deciding sets this season.
  • ⚠️ Weak on return (31.8% against the first serve), and has won only 35% of his recent matches.

🔍 Match Breakdown

Their third meeting, level at 1–1. Grenier won the most recent indoors in Pau in 2020. The two are priced level at 1.83.

Grenier has the bigger first serve (71.1% vs 64.1%) and saves more break points (60.5% vs 56.7%). Nagal lands more first serves (68.0% vs 63.8%) and is stronger behind the second (50.5% vs 47.4%).

Nagal is the better returner, with 35.4% vs 31.8% against the first serve and 54.3% vs 50.7% against the second, and converts more break points (43.7% vs 41.0%).

Grenier has the better last 10 (5–5 vs 3–7), but Nagal has won more of his recent matches (50% vs 35%). Grenier has won more deciding sets this season (64% vs 43%).

A level contest between Grenier's first serve and Nagal's return game.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricNagalGrenier
Ranking265394
Age2930
Last 103–75–5
Head-to-head11
First serves in68.0%63.8%
1st-serve points won64.1%71.1%
2nd-serve points won50.5%47.4%
Break points saved56.7%60.5%
Break points converted43.7%41.0%
Return points won (career)43%39%
Tiebreak win %56%51%
Deciding-set win % (career)48%52%
Best-of-3 win %59%57%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Philip Henning vs Carlo Alberto Caniato

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 12:30

🧠 Form & Context

Philip Henning

  • 📈 Ranked No. 236 at 25, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 66% of recent matches.
  • 🚀 Excellent behind his second serve: 55.6% of points won.
  • 🔒 Saves 62.9% of break points, and 66% in recent matches.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 35.1% against the first serve and 56.0% against the second.
  • 🏆 Has won 74% of best-of-three matches over his career.

Carlo Alberto Caniato

  • 📊 Ranked No. 306 at 21, 6–4 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Wins 70.3% behind his first serve, and 75% in recent matches.
  • 🎯 Strong behind his second serve: 53.4%.
  • 🔒 Saves 59.4% of break points.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 29% of deciding sets this season and 37% over his career.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. The two are priced level at 1.83.

Both are strong servers. They are level behind the first serve (70.3%), while Henning lands more first serves (65.6% vs 61.8%), wins more behind his second (55.6% vs 53.4%) and saves more break points (62.9% vs 59.4%).

Henning is also the better returner, with 35.1% vs 31.8% against the first serve and 56.0% vs 50.6% against the second, and converts more break points (46.0% vs 43.1%).

Both are 6–4 in their last 10, but Henning has won more of his recent matches (66% vs 59%) and has the far better records in deciding sets and tiebreaks.

Henning leads on almost every line, which makes the level price interesting.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricHenningCaniato
Ranking236306
Age2521
Last 106–46–4
Head-to-head00
First serves in65.6%61.8%
1st-serve points won70.3%70.3%
2nd-serve points won55.6%53.4%
Break points saved62.9%59.4%
Break points converted46.0%43.1%
Return points won (career)43%39%
Tiebreak win %56%44%
Deciding-set win % (career)56%37%
Best-of-3 win %74%55%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

Francesco Maestrelli vs Peter Makk

Taranto Challenger · Second Round · 5 November · 14:00

🧠 Form & Context

Francesco Maestrelli

  • 📉 Ranked No. 176 at 23, 4–6 in his last 10.
  • 🚀 Slightly the bigger first serve: 69.6% of points won.
  • 🔒 Saves 59.5% of break points, and 66% in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Has won 55% of his career tiebreaks.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 33% of his recent matches, and is weak behind his second serve (46.4%).

Peter Makk

  • 🔥 Ranked No. 537 at 25, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 68% of recent matches.
  • 🔁 The better returner: 34.3% against the first serve and 51.6% against the second.
  • 🚀 Stronger behind his second serve: 49.3%, and 51% in recent matches.
  • 🏆 Has won 57% of deciding sets and 59% of best-of-three matches over his career.
  • ⚠️ Has won only 39% of his career tiebreaks.

🔍 Match Breakdown

A first meeting. Maestrelli is the 1.33 favourite. Makk comes in after beating Romano in the first round.

On serve they are close. Maestrelli wins slightly more behind his first serve (69.6% vs 68.9%) and saves slightly more break points (59.5% vs 58.3%). Makk lands more first serves (62.9% vs 61.5%) and is far stronger behind the second (49.3% vs 46.4%).

Makk is the better returner, with 34.3% vs 33.6% against the first serve and 51.6% vs 49.8% against the second, and converts more break points (43.8% vs 42.6%).

The form is firmly with Makk: 7–3 in his last 10 against 4–6, and 68% vs 33% of recent matches won.

Maestrelli's ranking explains the price. Makk's form and return game make this much closer than 1.33.

📊 Tale of the Tape

MetricMaestrelliMakk
Ranking176537
Age2325
Last 104–67–3
Head-to-head00
First serves in61.5%62.9%
1st-serve points won69.6%68.9%
2nd-serve points won46.4%49.3%
Break points saved59.5%58.3%
Break points converted42.6%43.8%
Return points won (career)40%41%
Tiebreak win %55%39%
Deciding-set win % (career)55%57%
Best-of-3 win %53%59%

See ATP markets on Polymarket

PBTennis Quick Reads – Weekly Results (26 Oct – 1 Nov 2026)

Every day our PBTennis Patreon members get a short card of Quick Reads: hand-picked Challenger and Tour-level matches where the numbers p...