Date: 07 Oct 2025 • Card: EV-tested picks, live-bet triggers & bankroll anchors
Patterns & tempo: Andreeva’s early-taking backhand and weight of shot should own neutral exchanges on this medium-quick hard. Siegemund will counter by junking pace — slice, loft, and short angles — to break rhythm and bait overhits.
Serve/return levers: If Andreeva keeps second-serve points solid and avoids overpressing on return, she sustains scoreboard pressure. Siegemund’s best lane is elongating rallies, chipping low, and drawing forehand errors in cat-and-mouse exchanges.
Physical/state: Andreeva arrives fresher off a bye. Siegemund has court time here but recent travel and three-setters add mileage. If it runs long, youth and shot weight favor Andreeva.
Pick: Andreeva in straight sets (2–0), with one tight set possible. Siegemund’s craft will manufacture pockets of trouble — especially early — but over two sets Andreeva’s pace and depth should crack the defenses.
| Category | Andreeva | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 📈 Elite 2025 (Dubai & IW titles) | ↔️ 50/50 year; isolated peaks |
| Game identity | Early contact, heavy BH, depth control | Variety/slice, tempo changes, net looks |
| Serve/return axis | Applies return pressure; needs solid 2nd-serve pts | Protects with spots, uses junk to steal holds |
| Rally dynamics | Favored in neutral/short-medium exchanges | Wants extended, messy rallies |
| Physical/mileage | Fresher (bye) | Added load from recent schedule |
| Upset path | — | Slow it down, vary heights, target FH errors |
Live-bet lean: Andreeva after any slow start if she’s generating ≥3 BP looks by mid-S2; Siegemund if she’s consistently forcing rallies >5 shots and neutralizing BH pace with low slice.
First-strike vs absorption: Świątek’s heavy, early backhand and elite return put immediate stress on serves that don’t generate free points. Bouzková’s serve is placement-first; the holding challenge is withstanding repeated quality returns and +1 pressure.
Rally patterns: Bouzková is a world-class neutralizer — mixing height/angles and redirecting pace to turn long rallies into coin flips. If she stretches exchanges past the opening two patterns and forces Świątek to hit extra balls from the backhand corner, sets can stay tight.
Momentum & composure: Świątek looked flat late vs Navarro but typically rebounds fast after dips. Bouzková’s recent rhythm should help her avoid avalanches and drag at least one set deep.
Keys:
Bouzková: ≥65% first serves, depth XC to Świątek BH, deny short balls.
Świątek: Attack seconds, take time away on return, finish with FH inside-out patterns.
Pick: Świątek in two sets (one tight). Her ceiling, return pressure, and point-finishing weight should tell across two sets, even if Bouzková’s consistency turns one into a tug-of-war. Expect a sharper reset from Iga after Beijing.
| Category | Bouzková | Świątek |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 📈 Strong hard-court stretch since July | 📈 Elite season; minor Beijing dip |
| Game identity | Neutralizer, angles/height shifts | Heavy depth, early backhand, elite return |
| Serve profile | Placement-first; few freebies | Returner-first pressure creates breaks |
| Rally dynamics | Thrives in extended, patterned exchanges | Wins short/medium rallies with weight of shot |
| Upset/edge path | Lengthen points, target BH corner, protect 1st-serve % | Hammer 2nd serves, seize +1, force short replies |
| Risk flags | Hold vulnerability under repeat return pressure | Occasional mid-match dips if lengthened |
Live-bet lean: Świątek after any early dip if BP creation ≥3 looks through six return games; Bouzková if she’s consistently stretching rallies >5 shots and Świątek’s 2nd-serve points won % drops sub-45%.
First-strike vs structure: Ostapenko wants early contact and front-foot ball striking. When first-serve/first-ball timing lands, she flips scripts fast. Cirstea’s 2025 hard-court base — improved serve patterns and backhand redirection — gives her more rally control and margin in neutral.
Variance lever: The Latvian’s current form raises error-rate risk. Cirstea’s rhythm this season has been steadier, and post-Cleveland she’s handled pressure moments with cleaner decision-making.
Scoreboard stress: Their last three H2Hs went long. Expect spurts. If Cirstea absorbs a hot patch and then resets with deep cross exchanges before changing down the line, she can tilt longer passages.
Lean: Cirstea in three sets. Ostapenko’s upside and head-to-head lead keep the boom-patch risk live, but the Romanian’s current hard-court stability and confidence nudge the balance in a likely seesaw match.
| Category | Cirstea | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 📈 Consistent 2025, Cleveland title | 📉 Mixed; high peaks, recent dips |
| Game identity | Serve + BH redirect, structured rallies | First-strike aggression, early taking |
| Serve / +1 ball | Spots serve, builds depth then changes line | Relies on timing; errors spike when 1st% dips |
| Rally tolerance | Higher margin, steady depth | Lower margin, boom-bust patches |
| H2H snapshot | Trails 1–4; last 3 went 3 sets | Leads 4–1; recent 3-set wins |
| Upset/edge path | Absorb pace, reset with deep XC → DTL change | High 1st-serve %, early BH/FP winners, front-run |
| Risk flags | Can get passive vs power surges | Error cascades if timing off |
Live-bet lean: Cirstea after any early Ostapenko heater if Sorana’s depth stabilizes and BP looks arrive; Ostapenko if 1st-serve % is humming and she’s winning short-point share (<5 shots).
First-strike vs variety: Noskova’s point-starting power — big first ball, depth through the middle, and backhand line changes — has troubled Putintseva twice this season. If the first-serve clip is solid and she sets terms early, she dictates.
Putintseva’s disruptors: Slices, height changes, drop shots, and backhand DTL redirects are levers to lengthen exchanges and tease errors. Expect targeted pressure on Noskova’s second serve.
Scheduling angle: Noskova is hot but coming off a taxing Beijing final — slight let-down/slow-start risk. Putintseva’s comfortable qualies offer timing and confidence without heavy load.
Scoreboard pressure: When Noskova’s depth holds, rallies stay neutral-to-offensive for her; once exchanges stretch, Putintseva’s anticipation and variety shine. Rally length likely decides it.
Lean: Noskova in three sets. The 2025 hard-court baseline and this year’s 2–0 H2H point her way, but the spot is tricky (quick turnaround vs a qualifier in rhythm). Live-dog path for Putintseva if she drags this into extended, physical rallies and needles the Noskova backhand early.
| Category | Noskova | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | Beijing runner-up; high ceiling | Qualies surge; stabilizing |
| Game identity | First-strike power, BH line change | Variety/height shifts, DTL disrupt |
| Serve / +1 | Needs solid 1st-serve clip to set terms | Targets 2nd serve; extends rallies |
| Scheduling / load | Quick turnaround after final | Fresh timing from qualies |
| H2H snapshot | Leads 2–1 (Doha/Dubai ’25) | Won USO ’24 in straights |
| Win path | Depth through middle, early control | Mix heights/pace, attack 2nd, elongate |
| Risk flags | Let-down/slow start risk | If rallies shorten, gets rushed |
Live-bet lean: Noskova after any slow S1 if hold% stabilizes and she’s winning BH-to-BH diagonals by mid-S2; Putintseva if she’s forcing >4-shot rallies consistently and carving errors on Noskova’s 2nd-serve points.
First-strike vs counter-punch: Vekic’s lane runs through a healthy first-serve % and forehand finishes; when that dips, errors creep. Bencic takes time away with early contact, redirects pace, and reliably picks on second serves — especially into the backhand corner.
Rally control: The Swiss’ compact swings and baseline depth should blunt Vekic’s first strike and force longer exchanges, where Bencic has been steadier in 2025.
Confidence & context: Bencic arrives off a quality Beijing week and a strong season résumé. Vekic’s year has been streaky with frequent early exits. Neither has thrived in Wuhan historically, but current form tilts clearly toward Bencic.
Upset keys (Vekic): Land ≥65% first serves, keep a positive FH winner/error ratio, and shorten points. Otherwise Bencic’s return pressure and cleaner rally tolerance take over.
Pick: Bencic in two sets. Returning quality and on-time ball striking are reliable edges against Vekic’s more volatile serve–forehand pattern. With recent form and H2H support, the baseline share should favor the Swiss.
| Category | Bencic | Vekic |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 📈 Strong season; competitive vs elites | 📉 Results slide; rare streaks |
| Game identity | Early taking, redirection, depth control | First-strike serve + FH aggression |
| Serve / 2nd-serve pressure | Consistently attacks 2nd serves | 2nd serve can draw heat under pressure |
| Rally tolerance | High; compact mechanics hold up | Can leak errors if extended |
| H2H snapshot | Leads 4–1 | Trails; needs serve help |
| Upset path | N/A — maintain depth, pick on 2nd | ≥65% 1st serves, FH finishing, short points |
Live-bet lean: Bencic after any early dip if return BP creation is ≥3 looks through six return games.
Patterns & pace: Navarro builds patiently and counterpunches off both wings. When she owns baseline depth, short replies appear and she finishes cleanly. Zhang hits flatter/earlier with incisive down-the-line changes — patterns that can rush Navarro if first-ball timing lands.
Serve/return windows: Navarro’s return level has spiked in big matches (see Świątek win). Second-serve looks let her flip neutral to offense quickly. Zhang needs first-serve spots and forehand-led plus-one patterns to keep exchanges short.
Context & intangibles: H2H leans Zhang 1–0 (Beijing 2024) and the home crowd can buoy her starts. Over three sets, Navarro’s 2025 résumé vs top names and recent China swing level set a higher “floor.”
Pick: Navarro in three sets. Expect Zhang to ride the home lift and threaten early, but Navarro’s rally tolerance and return depth should wear through the length of the match.
| Category | Navarro | Zhang |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | High floor; big scalp (Świątek) but QF conversion lag | Hot China swing; confident on home soil |
| Game identity | Patient builder, counterpunch depth | Flat, early timing; DTL redirects |
| Serve/return axis | Return can seize momentum on 2nds | Needs first-serve locations to shorten |
| H2H snapshot | Trails 0–1 (Beijing 2024) | Leads 1–0; starts well with crowd tailwind |
| Path to win | Own depth, turn 2nd-serve looks into offense | Front-run with serve+FH, keep points short |
| Risk flags | Late-round conversion issues | If rallies lengthen, consistency can dip |
Live-bet lean: Navarro if she drops a tight S1 but is creating multiple BP looks; Zhang if she’s winning >70% first-serve points through the first 6 games.
First-strike vs depth: Sramkova’s best lanes are serve + forehand line and front-foot exchanges. Kalinskaya’s summer uptick came from absorbing pace, redirecting cleanly off both wings, and winning the +1 pattern with early timing and opportunistic net looks.
Consistency edge: Kalinskaya proved she can stitch together sets even when the A-game isn’t there; Sramkova’s 2025 hard-court baseline (10–15) hints at volatility under scoreboard pressure.
Start risk: Kalinskaya’s profile includes some slow starts/1R stumbles. If Sramkova jumps ahead and keeps points short, she can make it a coin flip; otherwise, Kalinskaya’s return depth and rally tolerance should wear her down.
Pick: Kalinskaya in two tight sets. If she serves to her summer baseline and takes Sramkova’s time on the backhand wing, she should control most neutral exchanges. Upset path exists only if Kalinskaya wobbles early and Sramkova sustains first-strike redline.
| Category | Sramkova | Kalinskaya |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 2025 dip; scattered peaks | Improved since July; steadier baseline |
| Game identity | First-strike serve + FH line | Absorb/redirect; clean timing |
| Serve / +1 ball | Needs short points to thrive | Wins +1 with depth and angles |
| Scoreboard composure | Can leak errors under pressure | Higher floor; better set stitching |
| Upset path | Fast starts, attack seconds, shorten rallies | Neutral control, body returns, BH targeting |
Live-bet lean: Kalinskaya after any early dip if first-serve % normalizes by mid-S1.
Surface: Hard • Round: Main Draw • Location: Wuhan, China
Raducanu leads 1–0 (Eastbourne 2025 — 6–7(5), 6–3, 6–1).
Get the detailed Match Breakdown on Patreon — support us for the price of a coffee.
Recent reference point: Their US Open meeting tilted Muchova’s way in a three-set marathon, a useful compass for patterns under pressure.
Patterns & tools: Kostyuk brings first-strike intent from both wings and can crowd the baseline to rush contact. Muchova’s all-court craft — serve variety, slice change-ups, and timely net forays — breaks rhythm and steals cheap holds when the first ball lands.
Serve/return phase: Neither is overly reliant on aces; the +1 ball is the battleground. Kostyuk’s return aggression can expose second serves; Muchova’s placement (wide/kicker) sets up forehand initiations and short-court patterns.
Momentum & mileage: Both have logged frequent deciders lately. If rallies lengthen, Muchova’s ability to vary height/pace can blunt Kostyuk’s tempo; if exchanges stay on a rope, Kostyuk’s first-strike pace plays up.
Lean: Karolina Muchova in three sets. The New York win, steady hard-court base (19–10), and knack for navigating deciding sets shade a close matchup. Kostyuk’s ceiling at 1000 level means long swings and live-bet opportunities if she captures early rhythm on return.
| Category | Kostyuk | Muchova |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 📈 Consistent 1000-level depth in 2025 | Steady since return; late-round reps at key stops |
| Game identity | First-strike aggression, early contact | All-court variety, rhythm disruption, net looks |
| Serve / +1 ball | Return-first pressure; can feast on seconds | Spot-serving opens forehand patterns |
| Clutch/deciders | Many three-setters; streaky patches | Multiple deciding-set wins vs quality opposition |
| Recent H2H | US Open R16 loss (3 sets) | US Open R16 win (3 sets) |
| Path to win | Pin depth early, attack 2nd serve, keep rallies linear | Mix heights/pace, protect serve with variety, press short balls |
Live-bet lean: Muchova if she drops a tight first set but holds ~two clean service games early in S2; Kostyuk if she’s +1 winner-heavy through first 4 return games.
First-strike edge → Kudermetova: When the first serve lands and the plus-one ball is set up, she dictates and shortens rallies.
Frech’s durability & depth: Her path is to neutralize pace, extend exchanges, and lean on redirect/consistency. Any dip on Veronika’s second serve or rhythm opens windows for the Pole.
Momentum vs precedent: H2H leans to Frech overall (3–2), but Kudermetova owns the two most recent wins (2017 Taipei, 2022 Monastir) and the bigger hard-court top gear.
Contextual tilt: Frech hasn’t recreated last year’s Wuhan magic and has struggled to stack wins; Veronika’s Cincinnati baseline suggests a higher ceiling even amid recent stumbles.
Pick: Kudermetova in two tight sets. If she keeps a healthy first-serve percentage and shields the backhand wing early in rallies, she controls scoreboard pressure. Frech can make this awkward by dragging points long and attacking second serves, but the favorite has clearer, repeatable paths.
| Category | Frech | Kudermetova |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | Results slide with sporadic peaks | Patchy since Cincy, higher ceiling |
| First-strike vs grind | Grind/redirect, extend rallies | First-strike power, short points |
| Serve profile | Low “free points”; relies on placement | When first-serve lands, dictates; 2nd can dip |
| Big-point seasoning | Solid fighter; fewer closing reps | Edge in first-strike conversion spots |
| Surface fit | Needs rhythm and depth to bother hitters | Hard-court patterns travel when timing is on |
Live-bet lean: Kudermetova after any early wobble if first-serve % normalizes.
First-strike patterns: Kenin takes the ball early, especially off the backhand line, and turns neutral balls into directional pressure when her depth holds. Zakharova’s timing is more workmanlike but steady; she’s happiest when rallies breathe and she can re-set with height and margin.
Pressure moments: Zakharova just emptied the tank vs Andreescu — a gritty swing from 0–3 & 3–5 in set two. That resilience travels, but the mileage could show if this match stretches past the 90-minute mark.
Serve/return balance: Neither has a “free-points” serve. Edges live in the +1 phase: Kenin’s first ball into the open court vs Zakharova’s body returns and backhand depth. If Kenin’s second-serve wobbles, Zakharova must lean into body-backhand looks and elongate exchanges.
Context risk: Kenin’s three-set profile keeps doors ajar; Zakharova has scalps (Vekić, Azarenka) but tends to level off vs top-30 pace/timing when she can’t drag points long.
Lean: Kenin in three sets. Zakharova’s confidence and toughness make the upset live if this becomes a grind, but Kenin’s higher baseline of shot-making plus big-point experience should carry if she manages the mid-match dips that have haunted her this season.
| Category | Zakharova | Kenin |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | Qualifier momentum; long match mileage | Patchy but higher ceiling; recent R3 in Beijing |
| First-strike vs grind | Prefers extended rallies; body-return patterns | Early taking, BH line control, +1 accuracy |
| Serve profile | Low free points; relies on placement | Second-serve volatility can creep in |
| Fatigue factor | Potential residue from Q/Andreescu marathon | Fresher legs; focus management key |
| Big-point seasoning | Improving; still building reps | Edge — former Slam champion, proven closings |
Pick: Kenin 2–1 (live-bet lean: Kenin after any early dip if price drifts).
🇯🇵 Naomi Osaka (#16, R; 180 cm)
🇨🇦 Leylah Fernandez (#27, L; 158 cm)
First strike vs. counterpunch: Osaka’s serve and first ball can seize quick control; Fernandez excels at absorbing pace and redirecting with the lefty FH into Osaka’s BH corner.
Serve/return patterns: Osaka must protect second-serve points—Fernandez’s early contact and return stance can draw errors. If Naomi lands first serves at volume, rallies shorten and tilt her way.
Rally length & discipline: Longer, physical exchanges favor Fernandez’s court coverage and resilience. Osaka thrives finishing ≤5 shots and keeping heavy FH depth to the Fernandez backhand.
Scoreboard pressure: Fernandez has been clutch in tight sets this summer; Osaka’s break-point composure becomes the swing factor if we get tiebreaky.
Leaning Osaka in a momentum-swinger. If Naomi’s first-serve percentage stays high and she protects the BH line, she should edge the key moments. Fernandez’s counterpunching and lefty patterns keep this a live-dog spot—expect at least one tight set.
Pick: Osaka in three sets.
| Metric | Naomi Osaka | Leylah Fernandez |
|---|---|---|
| Rank / Hand / Height | #16 / Right / 180 cm | #27 / Left / 158 cm |
| 2025 W–L (overall | hard) | 32–15 | 21–8 | 25–22 | 19–13 |
| Recent highlights | USO SF; Montreal F; Auckland F | Washington 🏆; Beijing R3 (vs Gauff) |
| Beijing note | R2 loss to Sasnovich | Pushed Gauff to 3 sets |
| H2H | Trails 0–1 (USO ’21) | Leads 1–0 |
| Style cues | Serve + FH first strike; ≤5-shot bias | Absorb/redirect; lefty FH into BH |
🇺🇸 McCartney Kessler (#33, R)
🇷🇴 Jaqueline Cristian (#48, R; 180 cm)
Surface shift: Their lone H2H was Cristian in Madrid 2024 qualifying on clay (7–6, 6–4). Wuhan is hard, where Kessler’s 2025 body of work (24–13) and recent Beijing scalps suggest the higher baseline level.
First-strike vs counterpunch: Kessler’s direct, first-ball aggression has cashed against both flat hitters (Mertens) and variety (Krejcikova, until retirement). Cristian’s best patches come absorbing pace and countering cleanly (see Collins at the USO), but week-to-week consistency hasn’t stuck.
Scoreboard pressure & serve: At Kessler’s good weeks she strings holds and saves BPs well; Cristian’s slow starts have stung on the Asian swing. If the Romanian doesn’t spike on return early, this can tilt fast.
Intangibles: Kessler brings confidence and rhythm from Beijing; Cristian’s recent travel/form dip narrows margin in tight sets.
Form and surface lean to the American. Cristian is dangerous if she spikes on return, but current rhythm and hard-court output nudge the opener toward Kessler.
Pick: Kessler in two tight sets.
| Metric | McCartney Kessler | Jaqueline Cristian |
|---|---|---|
| Rank / Hand / Height | #33 / R / — | #48 / R / 180 cm |
| 2025 W–L (overall | hard) | 34–21 | 24–13 | 28–22 | 16–12 |
| Recent results | Beijing R16 (d. Mertens; d. Krejcikova ret.; l. Lys) | R1 exits in Seoul & Beijing; USO R3 |
| 2025 titles | Hobart, Nottingham; Austin F | Puerto Vallarta 125 🏆; Rabat F |
| H2H | Trails 0–1 (Madrid ’24 Q, clay) | Leads 1–0 (Madrid ’24 Q, clay) |
| Style cues | Serve + FH first strike; front-run when holds flow | Absorb/redirect; flatter pace when confident |
Event: Wuhan • Surface: Hard • Round: Main Draw
Available to Patreon members — just a coffee to join.
🇲🇨 Valentin Vacherot (#204, R; 193 cm)
🇳🇱 Tallon Griekspoor (#31, R; 188 cm)
Momentum vs. scar tissue: Vacherot’s clean qualifying-to-R16 surge meets Griekspoor’s confidence jolt from knocking off the defending champ (via retirement).
Conditions factor: Shanghai’s heat/humidity have tilted matches toward concise patterns and serve protection. Griekspoor’s first-strike bias fits the brief, but Vacherot’s +1 ball has been rock-solid all week.
Return pressure: On paper, Griekspoor owns the sturdier hard-court résumé at ATP level. Vacherot’s path here included a retirement and streaky Bublik — the baseline weight steps up a notch today.
Griekspoor arrives with a tangible confidence reset and the higher hard-court ceiling at Masters level. Vacherot’s level this fortnight is real, so expect long hold spells and at least one breaker. If Tallon keeps the first-serve share healthy and rides the heat swings, he edges it.
Pick: Griekspoor in three sets (tiebreak likely).
| Metric | Valentin Vacherot | Tallon Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Rank / Hand / Height | #204 / Right / 193 cm | #31 / Right / 188 cm |
| 2025 W–L (overall | hard) | 42–22 | 14–9 | 31–22 | 10–10 |
| Shanghai so far | Qualies; d. Djere, Bublik; led Macháč (ret.) | d. Brooksby; d. Sinner (ret.) |
| Season highlights | First Masters R16; 4 wins vs top-50 in last 5 | Dubai SF; Indian Wells QF (d. Zverev) |
| Style cues | Solid +1 ball; depth to BH; breaker friendly | Serve + FH first-strike; quick holds |
🇪🇸 Jaume Munar (#41, R; 183 cm, 76 kg)
🇷🇸 Novak Djokovic (#5, R; 187 cm, 80 kg)
Patterns & weight of ball: It’s Munar’s rally tolerance versus Djokovic’s elite return and neutral control. Expect Novak to squeeze the second serve, live in the ad-court backhand exchange, then change line to finish.
Conditions: Heat and humidity reward clarity and low unforced errors. Djokovic has worn the conditions well; Munar’s three long wins could leave a little residue late.
Munar’s engine and form uptick make him pesky, but Djokovic controls more phases and applies steadier scoreboard pressure. A tiebreak or late push is live, yet the favorite’s precision and returning edge should carry him.
Pick: Djokovic in two tight sets.
| Metric | Jaume Munar | Novak Djokovic |
|---|---|---|
| Rank / Hand / Size | #41 / Right / 183 cm, 76 kg | #5 / Right / 187 cm, 80 kg |
| 2025 W–L (overall | hard) | 27–24 | 15–10 | 33–11 | 19–6 |
| Shanghai so far | Fucsovics (3), Cobolli (2), Nishioka (3) | Čilić (TB), Hanfmann (3) |
| Recent majors | US Open R16 (breakthrough) | US Open R16 |
| Shanghai résumé | — | 4× champion; 2024 finalist; QF+ every visit |
| H2H | Trails 0–1 (RG 2018) | Leads 1–0 |
| Style cues | Grind, depth, endurance; counterpunch & extend | World-class return; BH control; precise change-of-line |
Event: Rolex Shanghai Masters • Round: Quarterfinals • Surface: Hard
Patreon members get the complete tactical breakdown — join for the price of a coffee.
Event: Rolex Shanghai Masters • Round: Quarterfinals • Surface: Hard
Diallo leads 3–0 — wins on grass (’s-Hertogenbosch final), clay (Madrid), and hard (Vancouver CH).
Free for Patreon followers — just join and read, no payment required.
Surface: Clay • Round: Main Draw • Location: Cali, Colombia
Soto leads 1–0 (Medellín Challenger 2023 Q-1R — 6–4, 6–2).
Access the complete analysis with the New Challenger Tier on Patreon.
Surface: Indoor Hard • Round: Main Draw • Location: Roanne, France
Included with Patreon’s New Challenger Tier.
Surface: Clay • Round: Main Draw • Location: Valencia, Spain
Squire leads 1–0 (Rome Challenger 2023, clay — 6–4, 6–2).
In-depth Match Breakdown posts are New Challenger exclusives on Patreon.
Surface: Hard • Round: Main Draw • Location: Jinan, China
Smith leads 1–0 (Houston 2025, clay — 6–2, 6–2).
Access the full analysis with Patreon’s New Challenger Tier.
Surface: Clay • Round: Main Draw • Location: Mallorca
Brancaccio leads 1–0 (Bucharest ITF, July 2025).
Join New Challenger on Patreon to unlock the complete analysis.
Surface: Indoor Hard • Round: Main Draw • Location: Roanne, France
New Challenger subscribers get full Match Breakdown access.
Read the complete Gueymard Wayenburg vs Passaro analysis on Patreon
Surface: Hard • Round: Qualifying • Location: Jinan, China
Detailed Breakdowns are included in the New Challenger tier on Patreon.
