Get the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking.
ATP Shanghai — Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Daniil Medvedev
🧠 Form & Context
🇪🇸 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina (#20, R; 183 cm)
- 📈 2025: 37–22 overall | 22–13 on hard.
- ✅ Shanghai R2: d. Arnaldi 6–4, 6–4.
- 💥 2025 peaks: finals at Delray, Acapulco, Washington.
- 🧩 H2H vs Medvedev: 1–5 (l. 3–6, 3–6 in Beijing R16 last week; lone win Montreal 2024).
🇷🇺 Daniil Medvedev (#18, R; 198 cm)
- 📈 2025: 31–20 overall | 17–11 on hard.
- ✅ Shanghai R2: d. Svrcina 6–1, 6–1.
- ⚠️ Beijing SF: retired vs Learner Tien (after QF win vs Zverev).
- 🔁 Matchup edge this season (straight-sets win over ADF in Beijing).
🔍 Match Breakdown
Patterns: Medvedev’s deep return position and crosscourt backhand redirects soak up ADF’s first-strike forehand, forcing extra balls and inviting over-pressing errors.
Serve/Return battle: ADF must spike first-serve % and step inside on Medvedev’s second serve; without that, rallies drift straight into Daniil’s comfort zones.
Tactical variety: Short angles, drop shots, and early backhand takes are ADF’s levers to disrupt rhythm. If variety fades, the lengthened exchanges skew Medvedev.
Recent context: The brisk Beijing result says the current geometry favors Daniil; Shanghai again rewards depth, discipline, and counter-punch patience.
🔮 Prediction
Medvedev in two sets. ADF’s ceiling is real—front-running early and mixing shape could redraw the lines—but matchup momentum and baseline geometry still tilt Daniil.
📊 Tale of the Tape
| Metric | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Daniil Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| Rank / Hand / Height | #20 / R / 183 cm | #18 / R / 198 cm |
| 2025 W–L (overall | hard) | 37–22 | 22–13 | 31–20 | 17–11 |
| Shanghai so far | d. Arnaldi 6–4, 6–4 | d. Svrcina 6–1, 6–1 |
| H2H / Last meeting | 1–5 vs Medvedev | Beijing R16: d. ADF 6–3, 6–3 |
| Recent context | Finals at Delray, Acapulco, Washington | Beijing SF retirement after QF win vs Zverev |
| Style cues | Explosive FH, variety & short angles key | Deep return, BH redirect, rally elasticity |
No comments:
Post a Comment