Second-round previews from the Bratislava 2 Challenger (indoor hard), with form, serve and return numbers and a full Tale of the Tape for every match. Times are as listed by the tournament schedule and may move with the order of play.
Tom Gentzsch vs Matej Dodig
🧠 Form & Context
Tom Gentzsch
- 📈 Ranked No. 165 at 23, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 61% of recent matches.
- 🚀 Strong first serve: 71.0% of points won, and 74% in recent matches.
- 🔒 Saves 61.6% of break points and lands 63.4% of first serves.
- 🏆 Has won 63% of deciding sets this season and 59% of his career tiebreaks. Beat Damm in the first round.
- ⚠️ Weak behind his second serve: 47.6% of points won.
Matej Dodig
- 🔥 Ranked No. 138 at 21, 8–2 in his last 10 and winning 70% of recent matches.
- 🚀 Strong behind both serves: 70.7% on the first and 50.4% on the second.
- 🔒 Saves 60.8% of break points.
- 🏆 Has won 66% of deciding sets this season and 63% of best-of-three matches over his career.
- ⚠️ Lands only 59.8% of first serves and converts 40.8% of break points.
🔍 Match Breakdown
A first meeting. Dodig is the 1.53 favourite. Gentzsch comes in after beating the favourite Damm in the first round.
On serve they are very close. Gentzsch lands more first serves (63.4% vs 59.8%), and they are level behind the first serve (71.0% vs 70.7%). Dodig is stronger behind the second (50.4% vs 47.6%), and Gentzsch saves slightly more break points (61.6% vs 60.8%).
Neither is a strong returner. They are level against the first serve, Dodig is better against the second (51.9% vs 50.9%), and Gentzsch converts slightly more break points (42.0% vs 40.8%).
The form is with Dodig: 8–2 in his last 10 against 5–5, and 70% vs 61% of recent matches won. Gentzsch has the better tiebreak record (59% vs 56%).
A close contest on the numbers. Dodig's form explains the price, and with two strong servers, tiebreaks are likely.
📊 Tale of the Tape
| Metric | Gentzsch | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | 165 | 138 |
| Age | 23 | 21 |
| Last 10 | 5–5 | 8–2 |
| Head-to-head | 0 | 0 |
| First serves in | 63.4% | 59.8% |
| 1st-serve points won | 71.0% | 70.7% |
| 2nd-serve points won | 47.6% | 50.4% |
| Break points saved | 61.6% | 60.8% |
| Break points converted | 42.0% | 40.8% |
| Return points won (career) | 39% | 40% |
| Tiebreak win % | 59% | 56% |
| Deciding-set win % (career) | 50% | 60% |
| Best-of-3 win % | 59% | 63% |
Laslo Djere vs Otto Virtanen
🧠 Form & Context
Laslo Djere
- 📈 Ranked No. 137 at 31, 7–3 in his last 10 and winning 67% of recent matches.
- 🎯 Lands 60.5% of first serves and wins 50.0% behind his second.
- 🔒 Saves 60.1% of break points.
- 🏆 Has won 57% of deciding sets this season and over his career.
- ⚠️ Weak on return: 30.5% against the first serve.
Otto Virtanen
- 📊 Ranked No. 116 at 25, 5–5 in his last 10.
- 🚀 A big first serve: 73.6% of points won, and 77% in recent matches.
- 🔒 Saves 62.3% of break points, and 69% in recent matches.
- 🏆 Has won 54% of his career tiebreaks.
- ⚠️ Converts only 38.8% of break points (35% in recent matches), and has won 38% of deciding sets this season.
🔍 Match Breakdown
A first meeting. Virtanen is the 1.53 favourite.
Virtanen has the bigger first serve (73.6% vs 69.9%) and saves more break points (62.3% vs 60.1%). Djere lands slightly more first serves, and they are level behind the second.
Neither is a strong returner. They are level against the first serve (30.5% vs 30.8%), Djere is better against the second (51.4% vs 49.3%), and he converts more break points (41.2% vs 38.8%).
The form is with Djere: 7–3 in his last 10 against 5–5, and 67% vs 57% of recent matches won. He has also won far more deciding sets this season (57% vs 38%).
Expect plenty of holds. Virtanen's first serve explains the price, but Djere's form and record in tight finishes make this close.
📊 Tale of the Tape
| Metric | Djere | Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | 137 | 116 |
| Age | 31 | 25 |
| Last 10 | 7–3 | 5–5 |
| Head-to-head | 0 | 0 |
| First serves in | 60.5% | 59.2% |
| 1st-serve points won | 69.9% | 73.6% |
| 2nd-serve points won | 50.0% | 49.9% |
| Break points saved | 60.1% | 62.3% |
| Break points converted | 41.2% | 38.8% |
| Return points won (career) | 39% | 38% |
| Tiebreak win % | 49% | 54% |
| Deciding-set win % (career) | 57% | 51% |
| Best-of-3 win % | 60% | 59% |
Jurij Rodionov vs Toby Samuel
🧠 Form & Context
Jurij Rodionov
- 📈 Ranked No. 142 at 27, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 60% of recent matches.
- 🚀 Strong first serve: 70.7% of points won, and 73% in recent matches.
- 🔒 Saves 62.3% of break points, and 66% in recent matches.
- 🏆 Has won 55% of his career tiebreaks.
- ⚠️ Very weak on return: 29.8% against the first serve, and only 41.1% of break points converted.
Toby Samuel
- 📈 Ranked No. 97 at 24, 5–5 in his last 10 and winning 62% of recent matches.
- 🔁 The far better returner: 35.7% against the first serve and 53.3% against the second.
- 🎯 Converts 46.8% of break points and saves 64.7%.
- 🎯 Lands 65.4% of first serves and wins 52.2% behind his second.
- 🏆 Has won 74% of best-of-three matches over his career.
🔍 Match Breakdown
A first meeting. Samuel is the 1.61 favourite. Rodionov is a left-hander.
Samuel lands far more first serves (65.4% vs 60.6%), is stronger behind his second (52.2% vs 49.8%) and saves more break points (64.7% vs 62.3%). Behind the first serve they are level.
Samuel is far stronger on return. He wins 35.7% of points against the first serve to 29.8%, and 53.3% against the second to 50.4%. He also converts far more break points (46.8% vs 41.1%).
Rodionov has the slightly better last 10 (6–4 vs 5–5), and their recent match-win rates are almost identical (60% vs 62%).
Samuel leads on most serve and return lines, which supports the price.
📊 Tale of the Tape
| Metric | Rodionov | Samuel |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | 142 | 97 |
| Age | 27 | 24 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
| Head-to-head | 0 | 0 |
| First serves in | 60.6% | 65.4% |
| 1st-serve points won | 70.7% | 70.2% |
| 2nd-serve points won | 49.8% | 52.2% |
| Break points saved | 62.3% | 64.7% |
| Break points converted | 41.1% | 46.8% |
| Return points won (career) | 38% | 42% |
| Tiebreak win % | 55% | 59% |
| Deciding-set win % (career) | 52% | 51% |
| Best-of-3 win % | 57% | 74% |
Dalibor Svrcina vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
🧠 Form & Context
Dalibor Svrcina
- 📈 Ranked No. 119 at 24, 6–4 in his last 10 and winning 59% of recent matches.
- 🔁 An outstanding returner: 38.6% against the first serve and 55.8% against the second.
- 🎯 Converts 48.4% of his break points.
- 🎯 Lands 66.1% of first serves.
- ⚠️ Weak on serve: 62.5% behind his first serve, 44.6% behind his second, and 54.2% of break points saved.
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
- 📉 Ranked No. 145 at 23, 4–6 in his last 10.
- 🚀 A huge serve: 77.7% behind his first serve and 52.2% behind his second.
- 🔒 Saves 66.2% of break points.
- 🏆 Has won 60% of deciding sets and 58% of tiebreaks over his career.
- ⚠️ Very weak on return: 25.0% against the first serve and 41.7% against the second. Has won only 39% of his recent matches.
🔍 Match Breakdown
A first meeting. Mpetshi Perricard is the 1.66 favourite.
Mpetshi Perricard is far stronger on serve. He wins 77.7% behind his first serve to 62.5%, 52.2% behind his second to 44.6%, and saves far more break points (66.2% vs 54.2%).
Svrcina is far stronger on return. He wins 38.6% of points against the first serve to 25.0%, and 55.8% against the second to 41.7%. He also converts far more break points (48.4% vs 34.3%).
The form is with Svrcina: 6–4 in his last 10 against 4–6, and 59% vs 39% of recent matches won.
An extreme serve-versus-return contest. Expect tiebreaks, where Mpetshi Perricard has the better record.
📊 Tale of the Tape
| Metric | Svrcina | Mpetshi Perricard |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | 119 | 145 |
| Age | 24 | 23 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 4–6 |
| Head-to-head | 0 | 0 |
| First serves in | 66.1% | 63.8% |
| 1st-serve points won | 62.5% | 77.7% |
| 2nd-serve points won | 44.6% | 52.2% |
| Break points saved | 54.2% | 66.2% |
| Break points converted | 48.4% | 34.3% |
| Return points won (career) | 45% | 31% |
| Tiebreak win % | 51% | 58% |
| Deciding-set win % (career) | 54% | 60% |
| Best-of-3 win % | 57% | 56% |
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Kimmer Coppejans
🧠 Form & Context
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
- 📈 Ranked No. 182 at 20, 6–4 in his last 10.
- 🚀 Stronger behind both serves: 68.2% on the first and 51.0% on the second.
- 🔒 Saves 58.6% of break points.
- 🏆 Won their only meeting, and has won 70% of deciding sets this season and 64% over his career.
- ⚠️ Has won only 49% of his recent matches, and converted 40% of break points in recent matches.
Kimmer Coppejans
- 📉 Ranked No. 225 at 32, 3–7 in his last 10.
- 🔁 The better returner: 35.3% against the first serve and 52.6% against the second.
- 🎯 Lands 64.2% of first serves.
- 🏆 Has won 57% of deciding sets over his career.
- ⚠️ Weak behind his second serve (48.4%, and 46% in recent matches).
🔍 Match Breakdown
Their second meeting. Budkov Kjaer came from a set down to win the first at an ITF event in Sardinia in 2024. He is the 1.33 favourite.
Budkov Kjaer is the stronger server. He wins 68.2% behind his first serve to 67.1%, 51.0% behind his second to 48.4%, and saves slightly more break points (58.6% vs 58.0%). Coppejans lands slightly more first serves.
Coppejans is the better returner, with 35.3% vs 32.5% against the first serve and 52.6% vs 52.2% against the second. Budkov Kjaer converts slightly more break points (44.1% vs 43.3%).
Budkov Kjaer has the better last 10 (6–4 vs 3–7), but Coppejans has won more of his recent matches (55% vs 49%). Budkov Kjaer has the far better record in deciding sets (70% vs 55% this season).
Budkov Kjaer's serve and record in tight finishes support the price. Coppejans's return game and experience could make it closer.
📊 Tale of the Tape
| Metric | Budkov Kjaer | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | 182 | 225 |
| Age | 20 | 32 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 3–7 |
| Head-to-head | 1 | 0 |
| First serves in | 63.2% | 64.2% |
| 1st-serve points won | 68.2% | 67.1% |
| 2nd-serve points won | 51.0% | 48.4% |
| Break points saved | 58.6% | 58.0% |
| Break points converted | 44.1% | 43.3% |
| Return points won (career) | 40% | 42% |
| Tiebreak win % | 56% | 54% |
| Deciding-set win % (career) | 64% | 57% |
| Best-of-3 win % | 61% | 58% |
No comments:
Post a Comment