Tours: ATP Tokyo & Beijing • WTA Beijing • Date: 30 Sep 2025
Jasmine Paolini (🇮🇹 #8)
Marie Bouzková (🇨🇿 #52)
Tempo: Paolini wants first-strike rhythm off serve + FH; Bouzková will slow things with height and angles, elongating rallies and testing discipline.
Return games: Both return well; Paolini’s aggressive read on second serves could create early scoreboard leverage.
Neutral tolerance: Longer exchanges tilt slightly Bouzková; Paolini needs proactive direction changes and timely net closes when space opens.
Score pressure: In tighter sets (>10 games), Bouzková thrives; Paolini should front-run with quick holds to keep rallies on her terms.
Bouzková’s grit and defense can drag this deep, but Paolini’s red-hot China form, first-strike accuracy, and +1 forehand patterns give her the edge.
Pick: Paolini in two tight sets.
Karolína Muchová (🇨🇿 #15)
Amanda Anisimova (🇺🇸 #4)
Tempo control: Muchová will vary height and pace (low slice to FH, short angles) to blunt Anisimova’s backhand cannons. Anisimova needs early feet and depth to avoid slice exchanges.
Serve patterns: Muchová’s wide slider + third-ball touch vs Anisimova’s body-serve/into-BH targets. Protecting second serve is pivotal for both.
Rally DNA: Shorter, first-strike points favor Anisimova; extended, cat-and-mouse exchanges lean Muchová — especially with timely net forays.
Scoreboard pressure: If Anisimova nicks the opener, she often accelerates; if Muchová drags sets long (tiebreak territory), her variety gains value.
Muchová’s variety can make this awkward, but Anisimova’s current ball-striking and return aggression give her the higher ceiling in the biggest moments.
Pick: Anisimova in three sets.
Event: China Open • Surface: Hard • Round: Quarterfinal push
Lys leads 2–0 (includes Osaka 2024, ~2h40m battle).
Support with a coffee on Patreon to see every breakdown in full.
Belinda Bencic (🇨🇭 #16)
Coco Gauff (🇺🇸 #3, defending champion)
Serve/return volatility: If Gauff tidies the first serve and trims doubles, her return depth can pin Bencic and force shorter replies. If the serve wobbles, Bencic’s early-taken backhand will rob time and flip baseline control.
FH cross vs BH line: Gauff’s heavy forehand cross into the Bencic backhand is a pressure pattern; Bencic must change line early with the backhand to avoid getting dragged into neutral grinds.
Scoreboard pressure: Bencic thrives when she strings routine holds; Gauff tends to create one decisive return surge per set in Beijing that swings momentum late.
Peak Bencic is dangerous when she’s on the rise and Coco’s serve blinks. But Gauff’s physical edge, scramble-to-strike sequences, and proven Beijing resilience tilt the balance in tight moments.
Pick: Gauff in three sets.
Event: China Open • Round: Semifinal • Surface: Hard
Tien leads 1–0 (Australian Open 2025, five sets).
Read the complete Tien vs Medvedev analysis on Patreon — coffee price access.
Event: China Open • Round: Semifinal • Surface: Hard
Event: Japan Open • Round: Final • Surface: Hard
Alcaraz leads 3–1 (including the 2025 Wimbledon SF; Fritz won their Laver Cup meeting).
Patreon has the full Match Breakdown — one coffee = all access.
Linda Noskova (🇨🇿 #27)
Zheng Qinwen (🇨🇳 #9)
First-strike battle: Noskova’s flattest pace can rush Zheng if the 1st-serve clip is high and rallies end < 5 shots.
Depth vs timing: Zheng’s heavier ball and depth typically open space after 3–4 exchanges — longer rallies tilt her way.
Rust factor: Timing looked fine in R2, but Noskova is a stiffer test; early scoreboard pressure is Linda’s best lever.
H2H lens: Zheng leads 2–0 (both on clay); her FH patterns have troubled Noskova’s backhand in prior meetings.
Zheng 2–0. Assuming the elbow holds up, Zheng’s weight of shot and serve/return balance should gradually tilt sets her way — even if Noskova lands pockets of first-strike winners.
| Category | Linda Noskova | Zheng Qinwen |
|---|---|---|
| Form this week | ✅ Routine vs Wang Xiyu. | ✅ Routine vs Arango on return from layoff. |
| 2025 Hard W-L | 18–13 — flat, aggressive timing. | — (limited post-op) — historically strong hard-court level. |
| Serve / +1 ball | Relies on first-strike BH; needs high 1st-serve%. | Varied serve spots → FH inside-out, then line. |
| Return pressure | Can jump 2nd serves; early contact robs time. | Heavier depth pushes contact late, creates short replies. |
| Rally DNA | Better in short, tempo-rush exchanges. | Better as rallies lengthen; controls height/weight. |
| H2H | Zheng leads 2–0 (both on clay). | |
Leans: Zheng ML; Noskova live if she lands >= 65% first serves and posts a +8 (or better) winner–UE differential early.
Emma Raducanu (🇬🇧 #32)
Jessica Pegula (🇺🇸 #7)
Serve/Return: Pegula’s compact ROS targets Emma’s 2nd serve; Raducanu needs first-serve spots (body & ad-T) to avoid neutral starts.
Rally shape: Short, first-strike exchanges favor Emma; extended patterns lean Pegula, who edits errors out of sets.
Scoreboard pressure: If Emma nicks the opener, her front-running is strong; Pegula’s experience shines in closing time, especially in tight third sets.
H2H lens: Pegula leads 2–1, including Miami ’25 QF (Pegula in 3). Emma’s win came on grass (Eastbourne ’24).
Pegula 2–1. Pegula’s higher floor and return patterns target Emma’s most fragile phase (2nd serve). Raducanu’s path is to take time away on return and lean on BH DTL to steal court; live dog if her first-serve clip stays high and points stay short.
| Category | Emma Raducanu | Jessica Pegula |
|---|---|---|
| Form this week | ✅ Straight-sets over Bucsa. | ✅ Cruise vs Tomljanović (6–0, 6–3). |
| 2025 Hard W-L | 17–11 — streaks with first-strike returns. | 28–10 — balanced hold/return profile. |
| Serve / 2nd-serve exposure | Needs precise spots to avoid Pegula ROS heat. | Compact ROS punishes mid 2nd serves. |
| Baseline patterns | BH DTL trigger; takes early to rob time. | FH cross to set BH line; edits errors out. |
| Closing time | Front-runs well when ahead. | Composed in late sets/tiebreaks. |
| H2H | Pegula leads 2–1 (Miami ’25 Pegula in 3; Raducanu’s win on grass at Eastbourne ’24). | |
Leans: Pegula ML; Raducanu live if early returns bite and her first-serve% holds above ~62%.
Zeynep Sonmez (🇹🇷 #82)
Anastasia Potapova (🇷🇺 #59)
Serve/Return: Sonmez should attack Potapova’s second serve and look for early BH down-the-line to flip court; Potapova aims to dominate +1 exchanges with FH from middle/ad patterns.
Rally shape: Longer exchanges lean Sonmez’s discipline; short, first-strike pockets lean Potapova’s pop.
Scoreboard levers: Sonmez has shown resilience in deciders; if she nicks the opener, Potapova’s error rate can spike while chasing. If Potapova front-runs with a high 1st-serve clip, momentum can snowball quickly.
Lean: Potapova 2–1. Ceiling a touch higher on a quicker day, but Sonmez’s form this week and three-set toughness keep this live. Live-dog angle for Zeynep if she extends rallies and holds Potapova to ≲ 55–58% first-serve in.
| Category | Zeynep Sonmez | Anastasia Potapova |
|---|---|---|
| Form this week | 🔥 Clean win + upset over Tauson in 3. | ⬆️ Two routine straights (Siniaková, Mboko). |
| Surface (Hard ’25) | 10–11 — wins via depth/consistency. | 9–10 — first-strike reliant; better indoors. |
| Serve / +1 ball | Improving ad-court targets; builds with BH depth. | Edge — big 1st serve → FH control from middle. |
| Return pressure | Can pick on 2nd serve; BH DTL trigger. | Attacks short looks; vulnerable if rushed wide BH. |
| Rally DNA | Disciplined, higher tolerance in length. | Explosive in short, first-strike phases. |
| Path to win | Lengthen exchanges, vary height/shape, target 2nd serve. | Keep 1st-serve% high, seize +1 FH, avoid prolonged neutral. |
Leans: Potapova ML; Sonmez live if early neutral rallies bite and Potapova’s 1st-serve% slips under ~57%.
Daniil Medvedev (🇷🇺 #18)
Alexander Zverev (🇩🇪 #3)
Patterns: Medvedev’s deep return position + elastic defense has historically bothered Zverev, who can drift passive in longer exchanges.
Serve dynamics: Zverev needs a big 1st-serve night and +1 forehand finishes to avoid the neutral rallies Daniil thrives on; Medvedev’s 2nd-serve ROS squeezes backup deliveries.
Psychology: Despite dips vs top-5 this year, Medvedev owns the recent rhythm of this rivalry (arrives on a four-match win streak vs Zverev).
Scoreboard pressure: If Zverev shortens points and protects early service games, TBs aid him; if rallies stretch and returns bite, Medvedev dictates with depth and patience.
Pick: Medvedev 2–1. Form uptick + matchup history lean Daniil. Zverev’s path is there — serve big and finish early — but Beijing’s slightly slower patterns and Medvedev’s comfort tilt it his way.
| Category | Daniil Medvedev | Alexander Zverev |
|---|---|---|
| Form this week | Two clean straights; extra work on practice court. | Scrapped past Moutet after routine R1; battle-tested. |
| Beijing history | F ’23, SF ’24; perfect in QFs here. | QF+ in 4 of last 5 entries; strong baseline. |
| Serve / +1 patterns | Relies on depth/placement; +1 FH when dragged short. | Edge on raw first-strike; needs 65%+ 1st serve to flow. |
| Return / Pressure | Deep ROS neutralizes pace; elite 2nd-serve punishment. | Blocks well, but less damage vs deep returns. |
| Rally tolerance | Elastic defense; thrives in extended neutral. | Better when proactive; can stall into BH cross ruts. |
| Rivalry texture | On a recent win streak vs Zverev. | Needs short-point bias to flip script. |
| Path to win | Lengthen rallies, target 2nd serve, control depth. | High 1st-serve% + +1 FH; force TBs, avoid grind. |
Leans: Medvedev ML; Zverev live only if early holds are routine and first-serve% is humming (>= 65%).
Event: China Open • Round: QF • Surface: Hard
Patreon members enjoy daily predictions + value bets (coffee price only).
Carlos Alcaraz (🇪🇸 #1)
Casper Ruud (🇳🇴 #12)
Plus-one leverage: Alcaraz’s +1 forehand and backhand DTL redirect flip court position quickly.
Ruud’s lane: Land ≥ 65% first serves, attack FH inside-out, keep rallies short to dodge Alcaraz’s re-accelerations.
Scoreboard texture: If sets reach 5-all, tiebreak variance helps Ruud; otherwise baseline/intensity edge to Alcaraz.
Alcaraz 2–0. Ruud live only if he nicks early breaks and drags sets to TBs; market is rightly short on the favorite.
| Category | Carlos Alcaraz | Casper Ruud |
|---|---|---|
| Form this week | 🔥 Three straight-set wins, minimal court time. | 👍 Built into the week; one 3-setter, then two clean wins. |
| Serve / +1 patterns | Edge — serve spots → FH blast or BH DTL change. | Needs 1st-serve flow to protect BH and set FH patterns. |
| Return pressure | Aggressive ROS, jumps second serves early. | Solid ROS when settled, but less first-strike damage. |
| Rally DNA | Explosive re-accels, wins chaotic exchanges. | Prefers structured, forehand-led patterns. |
| Path to win | Maintain baseline weight; attack Ruud’s BH wing. | Shorten points; ride serve + FH inside-out; force TBs. |
Leans: Alcaraz ML; consider Alcaraz −3.5 only if early return looks are plentiful and Ruud’s 1st-serve% is sub-60.
Taylor Fritz (🇺🇸 #5)
Jenson Brooksby (🇺🇸 #86)
Patterns: Fritz looks to shorten with serve + FH; Brooksby disrupts rhythm with pace/height changes and deep BH redirects.
Returns: Brooksby’s block return can neutralize second serves; Fritz must keep 1st-serve% high.
Fitness/legs: Brooksby fresher (all straights); Fritz has logged mileage but has closed tight sets well.
Fritz in three. Brooksby’s toolkit can drag this into trenches, but Fritz’s serve + tiebreak composure and Tokyo comfort tilt it his way.
| Category | Jenson Brooksby | Taylor Fritz |
|---|---|---|
| Form this week | 🔥 Straight-set wins over Humbert, Darderi, Rune. | 🧗 Three 3-set comebacks (Diallo, Borges, Korda). |
| Surface 2025 (Hard) | 9–8 — rhythm via disruption, not free points. | 28–9 — high first-strike success, strong TBs. |
| Serve / +1 ball | Serviceable; wins more with placement and disguise. | Edge — big first serve, FH finishes to both corners. |
| Return patterns | Block/chip neutralizes pace; elite depth on BH ROS. | Attacks short looks; must avoid BH cross ruts. |
| Rally DNA | Disruptive: height/tempo changes, redirect BH DTL. | Proactive: first-strike bias; keeps rallies shorter. |
| Tokyo history | — | Champion ’22; comfort with conditions. |
| Path to upset / win | Prolong neutral rallies; pressure 2nd serve; win long games. | Maintain 1st-serve ≥ 64%; avoid extended neutral; trust TB edge. |
Leans: Fritz ML; Over 23.0 live only if early service holds look routine on both sides.
Iga Świątek (🇵🇱 #2)
Camila Osorio (🇨🇴 #83)
Pattern control: Świątek’s heavy, high-margin forehand into Osorio’s backhand pins the Colombian deep; Iga then redirects down the line to finish.
Serve/return: Osorio’s second serve sits up for Iga’s aggressive ROS; early breaks likely set the tone.
Physical load: Osorio’s minutes in the legs matter against Iga’s rally weight and coverage. Any prolonged lull from Iga is Camila’s only door.
Świątek in two sets. Osorio’s variety can steal pockets of games, but Iga’s baseline weight, return pressure, and form edge point to a routine defense of her Beijing aura.
| Category | Iga Świątek | Camila Osorio |
|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 🔥 23–2 recent stretch; carrying titles momentum. | ⚖️ Battled through two 3-setters; confidence improved. |
| Beijing history | Champion ’23; spotless record at event. | Limited impact historically. |
| Serve / First-strike | Edge — patterns create +1 FH looks consistently. | Second serve attackable; must mix to avoid pressure. |
| Return / Pressure | Elite ROS; breaks early and often when dialed. | Solid anticipation, but vulnerable to pace through middle third. |
| Rally tolerance | High with heavy depth; flips defense to offense fast. | Scrappy and resourceful; wins when variety disrupts rhythm. |
| Physical layer | Fitness trending up post-Seoul; recovery on point. | Extra mileage this week; must shorten holds to stay fresh. |
Leans: Świątek ML; consider Under ladders only if Iga’s ROS is biting early (quick breaks, short holds).
Jannik Sinner (🇮🇹 #2)
Fabian Marozsán (🇭🇺 #57)
Serve + first ball: If Sinner lands ≈65% first serves, the +1 FH into Marozsán’s BH corner opens the court and blunts the Hungarian’s counter-angles.
Neutral tolerance: Marozsán thrives when he slows pace and springs surprise BH lines; Sinner’s depth/height control should reduce those looks.
Physical meter: Any Sinner lull (like Set 2 vs Atmane) brings Marozsán straight into play — especially in pattern-heavy games.
Scoreboard pressure: Sinner’s elite front-running on hard makes early breaks doubly costly; forces Marozsán into over-pressing windows.
Sinner in two sets. Expect cat-and-mouse stretches and a potentially tight opener, but Sinner’s serve patterns and baseline weight should keep the reins. Upset window opens only if Jannik’s intensity drops for extended patches.
| Category | Jannik Sinner | Fabian Marozsán | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form trend | 🚀 39–5 in ’25; routine win + reset after bri
Alex de Minaur vs Jakub MenšíkATP Beijing — Quarterfinal: Alex de Minaur vs Jakub MenšíkEvent: China Open • Round: QF • Surface: Hard 🧠 Form & ContextAlex de Minaur (🇦🇺 #8)
Jakub Menšík (🇨🇿 #19)
🔢 Head-to-Headde Minaur leads 3–0 (Vienna 2024; Rotterdam 2025; Laver Cup 2025). 🔍 Full Breakdown & Value BetsWant the full breakdown? Join for a coffee and get it all. Boisson vs NavarroGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Lois Boisson vs Emma Navarro — Beijing R3 Preview
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
Round of 16
H2H 0–0
🧠 Form & ContextLois Boisson (🇫🇷 #41)
Emma Navarro (🇺🇸 #17)
🔍 Match Breakdown
First-strike & pace management: Navarro’s compact backhand and early contact should target Boisson’s defense on hard; if Emma keeps depth through the middle third, she controls tempo. 🔮 PredictionNavarro in three sets. Boisson’s confidence and clay-built rally tolerance translate enough to land punches, but Navarro’s higher hard-court baseline and cleaner backhand patterns should decide the biggest points — provided she manages scoreboard nerves better than in R2. 📊 Tale of the Tape
Leans: Navarro ML; consider Boisson live if Navarro’s leads slip or thigh concern fades and rallies lengthen. Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Marta KostyukWTA Beijing — Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Marta KostyukEvent: China Open • Surface: Hard • Round: Main Draw 🧠 Form & ContextAliaksandra Sasnovich (🇧🇾 #130)
Marta Kostyuk (🇺🇦 #28)
🔍 Full Breakdown (FREE)Free for all Patreon followers — just follow and read. Andreeva vs Bouzas ManeiroGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Mirra Andreeva vs Jessica Bouzas Maneiro — Beijing R3 Preview
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
Round of 32 → R3
H2H 0–0
🧠 Form & ContextMirra Andreeva (🇷🇺 #5)
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro (🇪🇸 #48)
🔍 Match Breakdown
First-strike gap: Mirra’s serve patterns and forehand redirections shorten points and can rush JBM’s rhythm.
🔮 PredictionAndreeva in two sets. JBM can make the opener sticky, but Mirra’s return patterns and heavier baseline weight should tilt the key points. 📊 Tale of the Tape
Leans: Andreeva ML; JBM live looks only if she jumps ahead early and holds serve with comfort. Sunday, September 28, 2025🎾 Daily Rundown — 28.09.2025 (Sunday🎾 Daily Rundown — 28.09.2025 (Sunday)Tours: ATP Tokyo & Beijing • WTA Beijing
👉 Full Card & PicksZhang Shuai vs Amanda AnisimovaGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Zhang Shuai vs Amanda Anisimova — Beijing R3 Preview (Today 14:30)
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
3rd Round
🧠 Form & ContextZhang Shuai (🇨🇳 #112)
Amanda Anisimova (🇺🇸 #4)
🔍 Match BreakdownPatterns: Anisimova’s first-strike aggression (big FH + early BH) should push Zhang back. If Amanda lands a high 1st-serve rate, short-point bias tilts heavily her way. Zhang’s route: Lean on BH down-the-line redirects and change-of-pace to break rhythm, extend rallies, and ride crowd energy. If she turns it into a depth-and-shape battle, the upset window opens. Score texture: Zhang’s reads look sharp this week, but Anisimova’s 2025 ceiling has been elite, with fewer mid-match lapses since summer. 🔮 PredictionPick: Anisimova in 2 tight sets. Zhang’s Beijing aura can keep things close, but sustained hold pressure and cleaner first-strike patterns from Amanda should tell in the key games. One long set feels live. 📊 Tale of the Tape (Qualitative)
Muchova vs BadosaGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Muchova vs Badosa — Beijing R3 Preview
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
3rd Round
🧠 Form & ContextKarolina Muchova (🇨🇿 #15)
Paula Badosa (🇪🇸 #18)
🔍 Match BreakdownPatterns & tempo: Muchova’s variety—sneaky serve spots, knifed slice, early-taken backhand—lets her control direction and depth. Keep Badosa wide on the ad side, mix short-angle FH with surprise net forays, and she dictates. Badosa’s path: When healthy, heavy FH cross sets up BH DTL. Plan: pin Muchova’s BH corner and punish anything short. If slices/pace changes disrupt rhythm, stalls can appear. Physical/serve metrics: Muchova’s hold patterns look steadier right now. Badosa’s base level rose vs Ruzic, but she’s still rebuilding reps after the back layoff. H2H texture: Badosa leads 2–1, all on grass/clay; no hard-court meetings yet. Neutral hard slightly favors Muchova’s first-strike + variety package. 🔮 PredictionPick: Muchova in 2 tight sets. Badosa’s ceiling is high and H2H matters, but current sharpness and Beijing comfort lean to the Czech. Expect momentum swings and a few long games; edge Muchova in late return games. 📊 Tale of the Tape (Qualitative)
Bencic vs HonGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Bencic vs Hon — Beijing R3 Preview
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
3rd Round
🧠 Form & ContextBelinda Bencic (🇨🇭 #16)
Priscilla Hon (🇦🇺 #108)
🔍 Match BreakdownServe/return hinge: Bencic’s 1st-serve placement + on-the-rise backhand usually protect holds. If she dips into too many 2nds, Hon’s proactive ROS (as vs Ostapenko) can bite. Rally DNA: Bencic steals time, redirects line, and finishes with the backhand. Hon’s recent success stems from disciplined depth and attacking short 2nds — she must keep Belinda off the front foot. Scoreboard craft: Bencic flips neutral to offense in 2–3 shots, making her the better front-runner. Hon needs quick starts each set to avoid chasing. 🔮 PredictionPick: Bencic in 2 sets. Hon’s form is real and the return is humming, but Bencic’s higher rally weight, 1000-level experience, and problem-solving should carry — provided her 1st-serve% stays healthy. 📊 Tale of the Tape (Qualitative)
Paolini vs KeninGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Paolini vs Kenin — Beijing R3 Preview
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
3rd Round
🧠 Form & ContextJasmine Paolini (🇮🇹 #8)
Sofia Kenin (🇺🇸 #26)
🔍 Match BreakdownPatterns: Paolini’s compact first strike and improved D→O transitions have traveled at WTA 1000s. If she’s ≥60% on first serve and owns the +1 forehand, she controls tempo and spacing. Kenin’s blueprint: Early-taking on the rise, hold center court, redirect pace DTL—exactly what bothered Paolini in Dubai. If Kenin pins the BH wing and steals time, the H2H trend (3–0) matters. Form vs. history: H2H favors Kenin, but Paolini’s 2025 ceiling/poise is meaningfully higher. In scoreboard pressure moments, Jasmine’s recent big-match composure is a lever. 🔮 PredictionPick: Paolini in 3 sets. Kenin knows the matchup and will create timing stress, but Paolini’s 2025 form, serve phases, and physicality tilt the late games her way. 📊 Tale of the Tape (Qualitative)
Kudermetova vs BouzkovaGet the full slate and in-play cues on Patreon — early angles + closing-line tracking. Kudermetova vs Bouzkova — Beijing R3 Preview
WTA Beijing
Hard Court
3rd Round
🧠 Form & ContextVeronika Kudermetova (🇷🇺 #30)
Marie Bouzkova (🇨🇿 #52)
🔍 Match BreakdownPatterns: Kudermetova’s first-strike serve + flat FH can yank Bouzkova out of comfort zones. When rallies stretch, Bouzkova’s counterpunch/redirect craft and defensive elasticity tend to grind errors. Scoreboard pressure: VK’s volatility after building leads has popped up this season. Bouzkova’s double-tight win vs Linette hints she’s managing big points cleanly again. H2H texture & surface: Close series (4–3 VK). On slower-ish Beijing hard, Bouzkova’s depth control and absorption can neutralize VK pace — especially if VK’s 1st-serve% dips. 🔮 PredictionPick: Bouzkova in 3 sets. Slight lean to steadier recent form and rally tolerance in these conditions. VK can absolutely front-run if the first serve pops early, but Bouzkova’s consistency profile travels well here. 📊 Tale of the Tape (Qualitative)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
